McLean Carl A, Campbell Catherine M
Gender Institute, London School of Economics, UK.
Ethn Health. 2003 Feb;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1080/13557850303558.
Recruitment of informants can 'make or break' social research projects, yet this has received little research attention. Drawing on our recent qualitative research into health and social capital in a multi-ethnic neighbourhood in South England, this paper presents a detailed analysis of the complexities encountered in recruiting research informants who described themselves as African-Caribbean, Pakistani-Kashmiri and white English.
Three methods of recruitment were used: (1) advertisements and articles in local media, (2) institutional contacts through local voluntary organisations and (3) interpersonal contacts, referrals and snowballing. We compare and contrast the experiences of ethnically matched interviewers who conducted research amongst the three aforementioned ethnic groups. These experiences were recorded by means of lengthy interviewer 'debriefing questionnaires' that focused on factors that had served to help or hinder them in finding research participants. These questionnaires formed the basis of a discussion workshop in which the interviewers and researchers sought to identify the factors impacting on the recruitment process.
Our findings suggest that local advertisements and media contact worked best for recruiting members of the white English community in our South English town. Interpersonal contacts were crucial in recruiting Pakistani-Kashmiri informants. Institutional contacts were the most useful way of accessing African-Caribbean individuals.
We conclude that local ethnic identities and social networks produce qualitatively different responses to recruitment attempts in different communities. Such differences necessitate the employment of a range of recruitment methodologies and detailed formative research in a target community before commencing recruitment.
招募信息提供者可能会“决定”社会研究项目的成败,但这一点很少受到研究关注。基于我们最近对英格兰南部一个多民族社区的健康与社会资本进行的定性研究,本文详细分析了在招募自称为非裔加勒比人、巴基斯坦克什米尔人和英格兰白人的研究信息提供者过程中遇到的复杂情况。
采用了三种招募方法:(1)在当地媒体上刊登广告和文章;(2)通过当地志愿组织进行机构联系;(3)人际联系、推荐和滚雪球式招募。我们比较并对比了在上述三个种族群体中开展研究的种族匹配访谈者的经历。这些经历通过冗长的访谈者“汇报问卷”进行记录,问卷聚焦于有助于或阻碍他们找到研究参与者的因素。这些问卷构成了一个讨论研讨会的基础,在研讨会上,访谈者和研究人员试图确定影响招募过程的因素。
我们的研究结果表明,在我们位于英格兰南部的城镇,当地广告和媒体联系在招募英格兰白人社区成员方面效果最佳。人际联系在招募巴基斯坦克什米尔信息提供者方面至关重要。机构联系是接触非裔加勒比人的最有效方式。
我们得出结论,当地的种族身份和社会网络对不同社区的招募尝试会产生质的不同反应。这些差异使得在开始招募之前,需要在目标社区采用一系列招募方法并进行详细的形成性研究。