Norris Meriel
Centre for Research in Rehabilitation and Brunel Institute of Healthy Ageing, Brunel University , London , UK .
Ageing Soc. 2015 May;35(5):986-1010. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X14001366. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
If interviews are to be considered embodied experiences, than the potential influence of the embodied researcher must be explored. A focus on specific attributes such as age or ethnicity belies the complex and negotiated space that both researcher and participant inhabit simultaneously. Drawing on empirical research with stroke survivors in an ethnically mixed area of Indonesia, this paper highlights the importance of considering embodiment as a specific methodological concern. Three specific interactions are described and analysed, illustrating the active nature of the embodied researcher in narrative production and development. The intersectionality of embodied features is evident, alongside their fluctuating influence in time and place. These interactions draw attention to the need to consider the researcher within the interview process and the subsequent analysis and presentation of narrative findings. The paper concludes with a reinforcement of the importance of ongoing and meaningful reflexivity in research, a need to consider the researcher as the other participant, and specifically a call to engage with and present the dynamic nature of embodiment.
如果访谈被视为具身化体验,那么就必须探究具身化研究者的潜在影响。关注诸如年龄或种族等特定属性掩盖了研究者和参与者同时所处的复杂且经过协商的空间。本文借鉴在印度尼西亚一个种族混合地区对中风幸存者的实证研究,强调了将具身化视为一个特定方法论关注点的重要性。描述并分析了三种具体互动,说明了具身化研究者在叙事生成与发展中的积极性质。具身化特征的交叉性很明显,同时它们在时间和地点上的影响也在波动。这些互动提请人们注意在访谈过程以及随后对叙事结果的分析和呈现中考虑研究者的必要性。本文最后强化了研究中持续且有意义的反思性的重要性,即需要将研究者视为另一位参与者,特别是呼吁探讨并呈现具身化的动态性质。