Weiss K M, Chapman H A, Strauss M E, Gilmore G C
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44141.
Psychiatry Res. 1992 Dec;44(3):203-16. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(92)90024-w.
Schizophrenic and control subjects were tested on two-flash fusion (TFF) and visual backward masking (VBM) tasks in a repeated measures design. Each subject was tested in a single session. Both tasks used the same equipment and stimuli. There was no difference between the groups in their ability to detect the presence of two separate stimuli in the TFF task. Schizophrenic subjects did require longer interstimulus intervals (ISI) than control subjects to accurately report one of the two targets in the VBM task. Analysis of individual targets reveals that the VBM deficit is a function of the similarity of the target and mask. The more feature detail discrimination necessary, the longer an ISI is required in VBM. The data are interpreted as supporting the conclusion that since the groups did not differ in their performance of the TFF task, which would also have been affected by a sensory abnormality, the deficit in VBM must be explained by reference to a higher level of information processing. The VBM deficit is a failure to decode the target stimulus, and is not simply a function of abnormalities due to an overactive transient channel system.
采用重复测量设计,对精神分裂症患者和对照组受试者进行双闪光融合(TFF)和视觉逆向掩蔽(VBM)任务测试。每位受试者在单一实验环节中接受测试。两项任务使用相同的设备和刺激物。在TFF任务中,两组在检测两个单独刺激物存在的能力上没有差异。在VBM任务中,精神分裂症患者准确报告两个目标之一所需的刺激间隔时间(ISI)确实比对照组受试者更长。对单个目标的分析表明,VBM缺陷是目标与掩蔽物相似性的函数。在VBM中,所需的特征细节辨别越多,所需的ISI就越长。这些数据被解释为支持以下结论:由于两组在TFF任务中的表现没有差异,而TFF任务也会受到感觉异常的影响,因此VBM缺陷必须通过参考更高层次的信息处理来解释。VBM缺陷是无法解码目标刺激,而不仅仅是由于过度活跃的瞬态通道系统导致的异常的函数。