Suppr超能文献

来自七个国家的青少年所报告问题的比较。

Comparisons of problems reported by youths from seven countries.

作者信息

Verhulst Frank C, Achenbach Thomas M, van der Ende Jan, Erol Nese, Lambert Michael C, Leung Patrick W L, Silva Maria A, Zilber Nelly, Zubrick Stephen R

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolecent Psychaitry, Erasmus MC-Sophia, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;160(8):1479-85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1479.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared ratings for self-reported behavioral and emotional problems in adolescents from seven countries.

METHOD

Youth Self-Report scores were analyzed for 7,137 adolescents ages 11-18 years from general population samples from Australia, China, Israel, Jamaica, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United States.

RESULTS

Comparisons of problems scores yielded small to medium effect sizes for cross-cultural variations. Youths from China and Jamaica had the highest and youths from Israel and Turkey had the lowest mean total problems scores. With cross-cultural consistency, girls scored higher for internalizing and lower for externalizing than boys. Cross-cultural correlations were high among the mean item scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Empirically based assessment provided a robust method for assessing and comparing adolescents' self-reported problems. Self-reports thus supplemented empirically based assessments of parent-reported problems and offered a cost-effective way of identifying problems for which adolescents from diverse cultural backgrounds may need help.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了来自七个国家的青少年自我报告的行为和情绪问题评分。

方法

对来自澳大利亚、中国、以色列、牙买加、荷兰、土耳其和美国普通人群样本的7137名11至18岁青少年的青少年自我报告得分进行了分析。

结果

问题得分的比较产生了小到中等效应量的跨文化差异。来自中国和牙买加的青少年平均总问题得分最高,来自以色列和土耳其的青少年平均总问题得分最低。在跨文化一致性方面,女孩在内化问题上得分高于男孩,在外化问题上得分低于男孩。平均项目得分之间的跨文化相关性很高。

结论

基于实证的评估为评估和比较青少年自我报告的问题提供了一种可靠的方法。自我报告因此补充了基于实证的家长报告问题评估,并提供了一种经济有效的方式来识别来自不同文化背景的青少年可能需要帮助的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验