Van Dierendonck B, Ladipo O A, Ekwempu C C, Giwa-Osagie O F, Ulasi J N
Organon International bv, Oss, The Netherlands.
Adv Contracept. 1992 Dec;8(4):327-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02042591.
A multicenter study was conducted in Nigeria, comparing the Multiload-Cu250 (MLCu250) with the Multiload-Cu375 (MLCu375). The two intrauterine devices were studied on aspects of effectiveness and acceptability. Parameters were observed and analyzed, using the life-table method of Tietze and Lewit. Continuation rates were excellent. Overall results were in line with studies done elsewhere in the world with Multiload devices, showing a slight superiority of the MLCu375 over the MLCu250.
在尼日利亚开展了一项多中心研究,对多负载铜250(MLCu250)和多负载铜375(MLCu375)进行比较。对这两种宫内节育器的有效性和可接受性方面进行了研究。使用蒂策和莱维特的寿命表法对参数进行了观察和分析。续用率良好。总体结果与世界其他地方对多负载装置所做的研究一致,显示MLCu375略优于MLCu250。