• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多负载宫内节育器十五年的经验。

Fifteen years' experience with the Multiload IUD.

作者信息

Van Os W A, Edelman D A

机构信息

Elisabeth Gasthuis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Adv Contracept. 1988 Sep;4(3):165-78. doi: 10.1007/BF01849434.

DOI:10.1007/BF01849434
PMID:3071108
Abstract

The Multiload IUD with an exposed copper surface area of 250 mm2 (MLCu250) was developed in 1972 and has become one of the most widely used IUDs. Modifications to the MLCu250 include an increase in the area of exposed copper wire to 375 mm2 (the MLCu375) and an increase in the diameter of copper wire from 0.3 to 0.4 mm. The Multiload has been evaluated extensively in noncomparative and comparative clinical trials. In these latter studies the MLCu250 performed better than the Cu-7 and TCu-200, and the MLCu375 performed better than the Fincoid or Nova T and about equally as well as the TCu380. Pooled data from over 26,000 insertions of the MLCu250 gave the following 3-year cumulative event rates (per 100 women): pregnancy, 2.0; expulsion, 3.1; removal for pain/bleeding, 7.1. Comparative studies of the Multiload and other IUDs have shown all IUDs in current use are associated with similar rates of pelvic inflammatory disease. IUDs such as the MLCu375 that have larger copper surface areas appear to be associated with lower ectopic pregnancy rates. Follow-up studies of women who have had their Multiloads removed indicate that use of the device does not impair future fertility or affect pregnancy outcome. All IUD users, regardless of the type of IUD used, are at risk of complications. On balance, the benefits of IUD usage far exceed the associated risks.

摘要

暴露铜表面积为250平方毫米的多负载宫内节育器(MLCu250)于1972年研发出来,已成为使用最广泛的宫内节育器之一。对MLCu250的改进包括将暴露铜线面积增加到375平方毫米(MLCu375),以及将铜线直径从0.3毫米增加到0.4毫米。多负载宫内节育器已在非对比性和对比性临床试验中得到广泛评估。在这些后期研究中,MLCu250的表现优于Cu - 7和TCu - 200,MLCu375的表现优于芬科德或诺瓦T,与TCu380大致相当。来自超过26000例MLCu250植入的汇总数据得出以下3年累积事件发生率(每100名女性):妊娠,2.0;排出,3.1;因疼痛/出血取出,7.1。多负载宫内节育器与其他宫内节育器的对比研究表明,目前使用的所有宫内节育器盆腔炎发生率相似。诸如MLCu375等铜表面积较大的宫内节育器似乎与较低的宫外孕发生率相关。对已取出多负载宫内节育器的女性的随访研究表明,使用该装置不会损害未来生育能力或影响妊娠结局。所有宫内节育器使用者,无论使用何种类型的宫内节育器,都有发生并发症的风险。总体而言,使用宫内节育器的益处远超过相关风险。

相似文献

1
Fifteen years' experience with the Multiload IUD.使用多负载宫内节育器十五年的经验。
Adv Contracept. 1988 Sep;4(3):165-78. doi: 10.1007/BF01849434.
2
The multiload IUD--a U.S. researcher's evaluation of a European device.多负载宫内节育器——一位美国研究人员对一种欧洲器械的评估
Contraception. 1992 Nov;46(5):407-25. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90145-j.
3
Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.泰国曼谷TCu 380A宫内节育器与ML 250宫内节育器的12个月对比多中心研究。
Contraception. 1998 Oct;58(4):201-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00097-3.
4
Intrauterine devices.宫内节育器
Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Oct;4(4):215-22.
5
An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器评估:与含铜宫内节育器相比的优缺点。
Contraception. 1991 Dec;44(6):573-88. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90078-t.
6
A comparative evaluation of the Multiload 250 and Multiload 375 intra-uterine devices.多负载250型和多负载375型宫内节育器的比较评估
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(6):521-6. doi: 10.3109/00016349009013330.
7
Evaluation of combined multiload copper IUD (MLCu250 and MLCu375).复合型含铜宫内节育器(MLCu250和MLCu375)的评估。
Int J Fertil. 1978;23(2):152-5.
8
An evaluation of six new intrauterine devices.六种新型宫内节育器的评估
Adv Contracept. 1994 Mar;10(1):57-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01986531.
9
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.铜T 380A宫内节育器与多负载铜375/250宫内节育器在一项对比临床试验中的性能表现。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65.
10
Long-term experience with Multiload intrauterine devices.多负载宫内节育器的长期经验
Adv Contracept. 1989 Sep;5(3):179-88. doi: 10.1007/BF01849361.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrauterine contraceptive device rupture. Follow-up of a retrospective cohort and clinical protocol. RUDIUS study.宫内节育器破裂。一项回顾性队列研究及临床方案的随访。RUDIUS研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Jan 12;8(1):e08751. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08751. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
How safe is emergency contraception?紧急避孕药有多安全?
Drug Saf. 2002;25(10):695-706. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225100-00002.