Barakat A R, Sutcliffe N, Schwab M
University Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth Building, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2007 Jul;62(7):661-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05059.x.
Target controlled infusion (TCI) pumps function using a programme based on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. We compared the Marsh and Schnider models to find out which better correlates with the clinically observed effect of propofol as assessed by the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAAS) score and the Bispectral index. We assessed the sedation score and Bispectral index score in 40 un-premedicated patients undergoing surgical procedures under spinal anaesthesia with propofol sedation to a target concentration of 2 microg.ml(-1). Half of the patients received TCI propofol driven by the Schnider model in effect site control, the other half were sedated with TCI propofol driven by the Marsh model in plasma control. We calculated the effect site concentration predicted by both models for all the patients. Changes in the sedation score and Bispectral index correlated better with the Marsh than with the Schnider effect site prediction in both study groups.
靶控输注(TCI)泵依据基于药代动力学/药效学模型的程序运行。我们比较了Marsh模型和Schnider模型,以确定哪一个与通过观察者警觉/镇静评估(OAAS)评分和脑电双频指数评估的丙泊酚临床观察效果具有更好的相关性。我们对40例未进行术前用药、在脊髓麻醉下接受手术且使用丙泊酚镇静至目标浓度2μg·ml⁻¹的患者进行了镇静评分和脑电双频指数评分。一半患者接受基于Schnider模型的效应室控制下的TCI丙泊酚输注,另一半患者接受基于Marsh模型的血浆控制下的TCI丙泊酚镇静。我们计算了两个模型对所有患者预测的效应室浓度。在两个研究组中,镇静评分和脑电双频指数的变化与Marsh模型效应室预测的相关性均优于Schnider模型。