Patton Lauren L
School of Dentistry CB 7450, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2003 Oct;39(7):708-23. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(03)00083-6.
A systematic review of community-based oral cancer screening programmes published between 1966 and March 2002 was undertaken. Data relating to study design, sampling and characteristics of the study group, interventions, and reported outcomes and diagnostic value of visual screening or adjunctive diagnostic aids were abstracted from 36 articles meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. From these reports, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of community-based oral cancer visual screening in enhancing the early detection of oral cancer, due to small effect size. While the evidence is fair to support use of toluidine blue as an aid in diagnosis of oral cancer, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether the use of this or other adjunctive techniques will increase the detection of oral malignancies in community screening programmes. Targeted clinical examination of high-risk individuals may be more effective than mass screening in facilitating early detection of oral cancers.
对1966年至2002年3月期间发表的基于社区的口腔癌筛查项目进行了系统评价。从36篇符合纳入和排除标准的文章中提取了与研究设计、研究组的抽样和特征、干预措施以及视觉筛查或辅助诊断工具的报告结果和诊断价值相关的数据。从这些报告来看,由于效应量较小,没有足够的证据证明基于社区的口腔癌视觉筛查在提高口腔癌早期检测方面的有效性。虽然有一定证据支持使用甲苯胺蓝辅助口腔癌诊断,但没有足够的证据确定使用这种或其他辅助技术是否会增加社区筛查项目中口腔恶性肿瘤的检出率。在促进口腔癌的早期检测方面,对高危个体进行有针对性的临床检查可能比大规模筛查更有效。