Lau Jeremy, O Guru, Warnakulasuriya Saman, Balasubramaniam Ramesh, Frydrych Agnieszka, Kujan Omar
UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
King's College London and WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer, London, UK.
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.12.004. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
This study presents the results of systematic reviews on adjunctive tools in screening and diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and to determine if the current literature supports their use as either an adjunctive tool or replacement of gold standard techniques. Systemic reviews and meta-analysis that evaluated adjunctive tools including chemiluminescence, tissue autofluorescence, tissue fluorescence spectroscopy, vital staining and cytology techniques were systematically examined using AMSTAR II. Twenty-seven systematic reviews were included. Five studies had a low quality of evidence, and nine studies had a critically low quality of evidence. This review found limited evidence to recommend chemiluminescence, tissue autofluorescence tools and vital staining as diagnostic tools, but only serve as clinical adjuncts to conventional oral examination. Cytology techniques and narrow-band imaging may be utilised as a non-invasive diagnostic adjunctive tool for the detection of OSCC and the malignant transformation of OPMD. In conclusion, this paper provides evidence on several types of adjunctive tools and provides recommendations on their use in clinical practice. These tools are considered useful as clinical adjuncts but there is insufficient evidence for their use as a diagnostic tool to replace gold standard conventional oral examination and surgical biopsy.
本研究展示了关于口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)和口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMD)筛查与诊断辅助工具的系统评价结果,并确定当前文献是否支持将其用作辅助工具或替代金标准技术。使用AMSTAR II系统地审查了评估包括化学发光、组织自发荧光、组织荧光光谱、活体染色和细胞学技术等辅助工具的系统评价和荟萃分析。共纳入27项系统评价。5项研究证据质量低,9项研究证据质量极低。本综述发现,推荐将化学发光、组织自发荧光工具和活体染色作为诊断工具的证据有限,但仅可作为传统口腔检查的临床辅助手段。细胞学技术和窄带成像可作为检测OSCC和OPMD恶性转化的非侵入性诊断辅助工具。总之,本文提供了几种辅助工具的证据,并就其在临床实践中的应用提出了建议。这些工具被认为作为临床辅助手段是有用的,但没有足够的证据证明它们可作为诊断工具来替代金标准的传统口腔检查和手术活检。