• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多元无知与随意性行为。

Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up.

作者信息

Lambert Tracy A, Kahn Arnold S, Apple Kevin J

机构信息

James Madison University, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2003 May;40(2):129-33. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552174.

DOI:10.1080/00224490309552174
PMID:12908120
Abstract

Hooking up--when two people agree to engage in sexual behavior for which there is no future commitment--has become popular on college campuses. In this study we examined the extent to which pluralistic ignorance affects hooking up. One hundred thirty-six female and 128 male college students answered questions regarding their own comfort and their perceived peers comfort in engaging in a variety of sexual behaviors while hooking up. We hypothesized and found that both women and men rated their peers as being more comfortable engaging in these behaviors than they rated themselves. Men expressed more comfort than did women in engaging in these behaviors, and both sexes overestimated the other gender s comfort with hooking up behaviors. Pluralistic ignorance appears to apply to hooking up on college campuses, and we explore some potential consequences of pluralistic ignorance in this context.

摘要

“勾搭”——即两人同意进行性行为且没有未来承诺——在大学校园里变得很普遍。在这项研究中,我们考察了多元无知在多大程度上影响“勾搭”行为。136名女大学生和128名男大学生回答了关于他们自己在“勾搭”时进行各种性行为的舒适度以及他们对同伴舒适度的认知的问题。我们假设并发现,男性和女性都认为同伴比自己更乐于进行这些行为。男性在进行这些行为时比女性表现得更自在,而且两性都高估了对方对“勾搭”行为的舒适度。多元无知似乎适用于大学校园里的“勾搭”行为,我们在这种背景下探讨了多元无知的一些潜在后果。

相似文献

1
Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up.多元无知与随意性行为。
J Sex Res. 2003 May;40(2):129-33. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552174.
2
Hooking up: gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance.勾搭:性别差异、进化与多元无知。
Evol Psychol. 2010 Jul 24;8(3):390-404. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800307.
3
Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: a health belief model perspective.大学生性行为与性风险行为:健康信念模型视角。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1196-209. doi: 10.1177/1049732309344206.
4
Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students.个性作为大学生随意性行为的一个预测因素。
J Community Health Nurs. 2008 Jan-Mar;25(1):26-43. doi: 10.1080/07370010701836385.
5
Talk about "hooking up": the influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex.谈论“ hookup”:大学生社交网络对非恋爱关系性行为的影响。
Health Commun. 2012;27(2):205-16. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.575540. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
6
Hookups and sexual regret among college women.大学女生中的一夜情与性后悔
J Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;148(1):77-89. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.1.77-90.
7
Oral sex: varied behaviors and perceptions in a college population.口交:大学生群体中的多样行为与认知
J Sex Res. 2007 Feb;44(1):28-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490709336790.
8
Young adults' emotional reactions after hooking up encounters.年轻人发生一夜情后的情绪反应。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Apr;40(2):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
9
Pluralistic ignorance and college student perceptions of gender-specific alcohol norms.多元无知与大学生对特定性别饮酒规范的认知
Health Psychol. 2003 Sep;22(5):479-86. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.479.
10
Hooking up and penetrative hookups: correlates that differentiate college men.发生性关系和有插入的性行为:区分大学生男性的相关因素。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 May;42(4):573-83. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9907-9. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
(Mis)estimation of the modal number of desired sexual partners.对理想性伴侣数量的(错误)估计。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315291. eCollection 2024.
2
Let's Talk About Condoms: Social Engagement in a Sexual Health Intervention Targeting Young Adults in Denmark.聊聊避孕套:丹麦一项针对年轻人的性健康干预中的社会参与情况。
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Jul 1;36(4):484-504. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2360733. eCollection 2024.
3
Modeling opinion misperception and the emergence of silence in online social system.
在线社交系统中意见误解和沉默的出现模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0296075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296075. eCollection 2024.
4
Sexual Violence Among Higher Education Students in the United Kingdom: Results from the Oxford Understanding Relationships, Sex, Power, Abuse and Consent Experiences Study.英国高等教育学生中的性暴力:牛津理解关系、性、权力、虐待和同意经验研究的结果。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 May;39(9-10):1926-1951. doi: 10.1177/08862605231212167. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
Relationship Between Sociosexuality and Condom Use Frequency Among Young French College Students.法国年轻大学生的社交性行为与避孕套使用频率之间的关系。
Eur J Psychol. 2023 Feb 28;19(1):67-78. doi: 10.5964/ejop.6793. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Sexual Behaviors, Satisfaction, and Intentions to Engage in Casual Sexual Relationships and Experiences in Emerging Adulthood.性行为、满意度以及在成年初期发生随意性关系和体验的意愿。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1575-1591. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02508-z. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
The voice of few, the opinions of many: evidence of social biases in Twitter COVID-19 fake news sharing.少数人的声音,多数人的观点:推特上新冠疫情虚假新闻传播中的社会偏见证据
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 26;9(10):220716. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220716. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Commitment and Extra-Dyadic Sexual Activity in College Students' Friends with Benefits Relationships: Moderating Effects of Gender.大学生“友达以上,恋人未满”关系中的承诺与婚外性行为:性别的调节作用
J Sex Res. 2023 Oct;60(8):1181-1192. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.2022585. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Meanings Ascribed to Sex and Commitment Among College-Attending and Non-College Emerging Adults: A Replication and Extension.大学生和非大学生青年中对性和承诺的看法:复制与扩展。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Aug;50(6):2435-2446. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02042-4. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
Investigating similarities and differences in individual reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis.调查个体对新冠疫情和气候危机反应的异同。
Clim Change. 2021;167(1-2):1. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03143-8. Epub 2021 Jul 2.