• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

勾搭:性别差异、进化与多元无知。

Hooking up: gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance.

作者信息

Reiber Chris, Garcia Justin R

机构信息

Graduate Program in Biomedical Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, and Institute for Evolutionary Studies (EvoS), Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY, USA.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2010 Jul 24;8(3):390-404. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800307.

DOI:10.1177/147470491000800307
PMID:22947808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480847/
Abstract

"Hooking-up"--engaging in no-strings-attached sexual behaviors with uncommitted partners--has become a norm on college campuses, and raises the potential for disease, unintended pregnancy, and physical and psychological trauma. The primacy of sex in the evolutionary process suggests that predictions derived from evolutionary theory may be a useful first step toward understanding these contemporary behaviors. This study assessed the hook-up behaviors and attitudes of 507 college students. As predicted by behavioral-evolutionary theory: men were more comfortable than women with all types of sexual behaviors; women correctly attributed higher comfort levels to men, but overestimated men's actual comfort levels; and men correctly attributed lower comfort levels to women, but still overestimated women's actual comfort levels. Both genders attributed higher comfort levels to same-gendered others, reinforcing a pluralistic ignorance effect that might contribute to the high frequency of hook-up behaviors in spite of the low comfort levels reported and suggesting that hooking up may be a modern form of intrasexual competition between females for potential mates.

摘要

“勾搭”——与关系不确定的伴侣进行无附加条件的性行为——已成为大学校园中的一种常态,而且增加了疾病、意外怀孕以及身心创伤的可能性。进化过程中性的首要地位表明,从进化理论得出的预测可能是理解这些当代行为的有用的第一步。本研究评估了507名大学生的勾搭行为及态度。正如行为进化理论所预测的:男性对各类性行为都比女性更为坦然;女性正确地认为男性更为坦然,但高估了男性实际的坦然程度;男性正确地认为女性坦然程度较低,但同样高估了女性实际的坦然程度。男女两性都认为同性别的其他人更坦然,强化了一种多元无知效应,这可能导致尽管报告的坦然程度较低但勾搭行为仍频发,并表明勾搭可能是女性之间为争夺潜在配偶而进行的种内竞争的一种现代形式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f8/10480847/adcc2ec1e3e5/10.1177_147470491000800307-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f8/10480847/d35b1e437352/10.1177_147470491000800307-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f8/10480847/adcc2ec1e3e5/10.1177_147470491000800307-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f8/10480847/d35b1e437352/10.1177_147470491000800307-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f8/10480847/adcc2ec1e3e5/10.1177_147470491000800307-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Hooking up: gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance.勾搭:性别差异、进化与多元无知。
Evol Psychol. 2010 Jul 24;8(3):390-404. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800307.
2
Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up.多元无知与随意性行为。
J Sex Res. 2003 May;40(2):129-33. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552174.
3
Assessing the Personal Negative Impacts of Hooking Up Experienced by College Students: Gender Differences and Mental Health.评估大学生经历的随意性行为带来的个人负面影响:性别差异与心理健康
J Sex Res. 2016 Sep;53(7):766-75. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1065951. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
4
"It Is A Purposefully Ambiguous Term": Examining Emerging Adults' Definitions of Hooking Up and How They Vary by Sex/Gender and Educational Background.“这是一个有意模糊的术语”:审视成年早期人群对 hookup 的定义,以及其在性别和教育背景上的差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2711-2725. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02911-8. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Hooking up during the college years: is there a pattern?大学期间的一夜情:是否存在某种模式?
Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(5):576-91. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.972458. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Examining the influence of gender and sexual motivation in college hookups.研究性别和性动机在大学一夜情中的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Nov-Dec;66(8):739-746. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440571. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Gender and knowledge about HIV, risky sexual behavior, and safer sex practices.性别与关于艾滋病病毒的知识、危险性行为及安全性行为做法
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Aug;18(4):313-24. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180405.
8
Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: a health belief model perspective.大学生性行为与性风险行为:健康信念模型视角。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1196-209. doi: 10.1177/1049732309344206.
9
What's Gender Got to Do With It? Sexual Double Standards and Power in Heterosexual College Hookups.这与性别有何关系?异性恋大学生一夜情中的性双重标准与权力
J Sex Res. 2016 Sep;53(7):754-65. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Casual hook up sex during the first year of college: Prospective associations with attitudes about sex and love relationships.大学一年级期间的随意性行为:与性观念及恋爱关系态度的前瞻性关联。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Nov;42(8):1451-62. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0078-0. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
(Mis)estimation of the modal number of desired sexual partners.对理想性伴侣数量的(错误)估计。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315291. eCollection 2024.
2
Oral Sex May Serve as Low Mate Value Compensation Among Men: Evidence from a Pre-registered Study.口交可能是男性低配偶价值的一种补偿方式:来自一项预注册研究的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):893-903. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03064-4. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
3
Combination of parent-child closeness and parent disapproval of teen sex predicts lower rates of sexual risk for offspring.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors and consequences of sexual "hookups" among college students: a short-term prospective study.大学生中“性约会”的预测因素及其后果:一项短期前瞻性研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Oct;39(5):1105-19. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
2
Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students.个性作为大学生随意性行为的一个预测因素。
J Community Health Nurs. 2008 Jan-Mar;25(1):26-43. doi: 10.1080/07370010701836385.
3
No strings attached: the nature of casual sex in college students.毫无附加条件:大学生随意性行为的本质。
亲子亲密关系与父母对青少年性行为的不赞成相结合,预示着后代的性风险发生率较低。
J Fam Issues. 2020 Oct;41(10):1834-1858. doi: 10.1177/0192513x19898515. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
An Empirical Examination of Hookup Definitions Across the Literature, 2000-2019. hookup 定义在文献中的实证检验,2000-2019 年。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr;51(3):1773-1781. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02115-4. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
Emotional Outcomes of Casual Sexual Relationships and Experiences: A Systematic Review.随意性关系和经历的情绪结果:系统评价。
J Sex Res. 2021 Oct;58(8):1069-1084. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1821163. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Casual Sexual Scripts on the Screen: A Quantitative Content Analysis.银幕上的随意性行为脚本:一项定量内容分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jul;47(5):1481-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1147-1. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
Consequences of Casual Sex Relationships and Experiences on Adolescents' Psychological Well-Being: A Prospective Study.随意性行为关系和经历对青少年心理健康的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
J Sex Res. 2017 Oct;54(8):1006-1017. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1255874. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
Sociosexual Attitudes, Sociosexual Behaviors, and Alcohol Use.社交性行为态度、社交性行为及酒精使用
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jul;77(4):629-37. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.629.
9
The Nature and Impact of Gendered Patterns of Peer Sexual Communications Among Heterosexual Emerging Adults.异性恋青少年中同伴性交流的性别模式的本质与影响
J Sex Res. 2016;53(3):298-308. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1015715. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
10
The (mal) adaptive value of mid-adolescent dating relationship labels.青少年中期恋爱关系标签的(不)适应性价值。
J Prim Prev. 2015 Jun;36(3):187-203. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0387-2.
J Sex Res. 2006 Aug;43(3):255-67. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552324.
4
Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse.错误认知大学生饮酒规范及相关问题:一项关于接触预防信息、感知规范与学生酒精滥用的全国性研究。
J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Jul;66(4):470-8. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.470.
5
Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up.多元无知与随意性行为。
J Sex Res. 2003 May;40(2):129-33. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552174.
6
Modification of sexual activities in the era of AIDS: a trend analysis of adolescent sexual activities.艾滋病时代性行为的变化:青少年性行为的趋势分析
Youth Soc. 1991 Sep;23(1):31-49. doi: 10.1177/0044118x91023001002.
7
A typology for campus-based alcohol prevention: moving toward environmental management strategies.基于校园的酒精预防类型学:迈向环境管理策略
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002 Mar(14):140-7. doi: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.140.
8
Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading.错误管理理论:跨性别读心偏差的新视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):81-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.81.
9
Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.多元无知与校园饮酒行为:对社会规范的错误认知所带来的一些后果
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Feb;64(2):243-56. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.2.243.
10
Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis.性行为中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):29-51. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29.