Pérez-González Luis Antonio, Serna Richard W
University of Oviedo, Spain.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):395-408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-395.
Three adolescents and 4 children participated in studies designed to examine contextually controlled conditional discrimination performance. In Study 1, participants selected Comparison B1 in the presence one stimulus (A1) and Comparison B2 in the presence of another stimulus (A2) using a matching-to-sample procedure. Next, contextual stimuli X1 or X2 were presented, such that in the presence of X1, selection of B1 given A1 and selection of B2 given A2 were reinforced; and in the presence of X2, selection of B2 given A1 and selection of B1 given A2 were reinforced. Then, new conditional discriminations were taught with Stimuli E and F. When the contextual Stimuli X1 and X2 were presented, participants selected the same comparisons as previously established in the EF relations in the presence of X1, but the opposite comparison as in the EF relations in the presence of X2. The results then were replicated with new Stimuli G and H. In Study 2, a new conditional discrimination, CD, was taught. Then, four combinations of two-element samples--C1 and D1, C2 and D2, C1 and D2, or C2 and D1--were presented with X1 and X2 as comparisons. Five of 6 participants selected X1 in the presence of C1 and D1 or C2 and D2, and selected X2 in the presence of C1 and D2 or C2 and D1. Finally, in Study 3, two new discriminations IJ and JK were taught. Then, the transitive IK relations were tested with X1 and X2 as contextual stimuli. The 4 participants selected K1 in the presence of I1 and K2 in the presence of I2 when the contextual stimulus was X1--demonstrating class formation--and selected the other comparisons when the contextual stimulus was X2. These results suggest that the contextual control functions of X1 and X2 transferred even to relations that had not been directly taught. These results extend those demonstrating generalized contextual control by showing transfer of functions of the contextual stimuli in transitivity tests and when the former contextual stimuli were presented as comparisons.
三名青少年和四名儿童参与了旨在检验情境控制条件性辨别表现的研究。在研究1中,参与者使用匹配样本程序,在出现一种刺激(A1)时选择比较项B1,在出现另一种刺激(A2)时选择比较项B2。接下来,呈现情境刺激X1或X2,使得在X1出现时,给定A1选择B1以及给定A2选择B2会得到强化;在X2出现时,给定A1选择B2以及给定A2选择B1会得到强化。然后,用刺激E和F教授新的条件性辨别。当呈现情境刺激X1和X2时,参与者在X1出现时选择与之前在EF关系中建立的相同比较项,但在X2出现时选择与EF关系中相反的比较项。然后用新的刺激G和H重复了这些结果。在研究2中,教授了一种新的条件性辨别CD。然后,呈现由两个元素组成的样本的四种组合——C1和D1、C2和D2、C1和D2或C2和D1——并将X1和X2作为比较项。6名参与者中有5名在C1和D1或C2和D2出现时选择X1,在C1和D2或C2和D1出现时选择X2。最后,在研究3中,教授了两种新的辨别IJ和JK。然后,用X1和X2作为情境刺激测试传递性IK关系。当情境刺激为X1时,4名参与者在I1出现时选择K1,在I2出现时选择K2——这表明形成了类别——而当情境刺激为X2时选择其他比较项。这些结果表明,X1和X2的情境控制功能甚至转移到了未直接教授的关系上。这些结果通过在传递性测试中以及当前情境刺激作为比较项呈现时情境刺激功能的转移,扩展了那些证明广义情境控制的结果。