Peijnenburg W J G M, Jager T
Laboratory for Ecotoxicology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003 Sep;56(1):63-77. doi: 10.1016/s0147-6513(03)00051-4.
Bioavailability and bioaccessibility are complex issues that determine whether or not adverse effects are to be expected when organisms or plants are exposed to contaminants. Clearly, the determinants of bioavailability and bioaccessibility must be understood if one is to monitor or, ultimately, predict the effects of metals. On the basis of a dynamic conceptual model, this article offers an analysis of the physicochemical and biological determinants underlying bioavailability and bioaccessibility. This analysis is used as the basis for a general monitoring strategy for assessing potentially and actually available and accessible metal fractions in the environmental matrices of water, soil, and sediment. We conclude that, lack of a universal expression of bioavailable and bioaccessible metal fractions precludes the presentation of a detailed monitoring strategy that is broadly applicable. Instead, we recommend that a critical assessment of the endpoints of determination become the basis for a need-specific monitoring strategy.
生物有效性和生物可及性是复杂的问题,它们决定了生物体或植物接触污染物时是否会产生不良反应。显然,如果要监测或最终预测金属的影响,就必须了解生物有效性和生物可及性的决定因素。基于一个动态概念模型,本文对生物有效性和生物可及性背后的物理化学和生物学决定因素进行了分析。该分析被用作一种通用监测策略的基础,以评估水、土壤和沉积物等环境基质中潜在的和实际可利用及可及的金属组分。我们得出结论,由于缺乏生物可利用和生物可及金属组分的通用表达方式,无法提出一个广泛适用的详细监测策略。相反,我们建议对测定终点进行批判性评估,以此作为按需定制监测策略的基础。