• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少诊断错误的元认知训练:准备好进入黄金时代了吗?

Metacognitive training to reduce diagnostic errors: ready for prime time?

作者信息

Graber Mark

机构信息

Medical Service, VA Medical Center-Northport, and Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8430, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):781. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00004
PMID:12915364
Abstract

The accuracy of medical diagnosis is often degraded when diagnosis deviates from the principles of normative decision making. Although diagnostic errors can potentially be reduced by metacognitive training, that proposal (put forth by Croskerry in an accompanying article) needs validation and extensive exploration.

摘要

当诊断偏离规范决策原则时,医学诊断的准确性往往会降低。尽管通过元认知训练有可能减少诊断错误,但该提议(由克罗斯克里在一篇配套文章中提出)需要验证和广泛探索。

相似文献

1
Metacognitive training to reduce diagnostic errors: ready for prime time?减少诊断错误的元认知训练:准备好进入黄金时代了吗?
Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):781. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00004.
2
How do we think? Can we learn to think better?我们如何思考?我们能学会更好地思考吗?
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):191-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000116.
3
Cognitive underpinnings of diagnostic error.
Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):782. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00005.
4
Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review.认知干预以减少诊断错误:叙述性综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):535-57. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000149. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking.临床决策中的认知强制策略。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;41(1):110-20. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.22.
6
Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies.临床推理中的错误:原因与补救策略。
BMJ. 2009 Jun 8;338:b1860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1860.
7
Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice.临床推理中的诊断错误和缺陷:实践中的机制和预防。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Oct 23;142:w13706. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13706. eCollection 2012.
8
Foreword for diagnostic errors and how to improve them.诊断错误及其改进方法前言。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):225-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.08.001.
9
Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis.诊断决策制定与改善诊断的策略。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.003.
10
Clinician mindfulness and patient safety.临床医生的正念与患者安全。
JAMA. 2010 Dec 8;304(22):2532-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1817.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis: Fundamental Principles and Methods.诊断:基本原理与方法。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 3;14(9):e28730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28730. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Checklists to reduce diagnostic error: a systematic review of the literature using a human factors framework.检查清单以减少诊断错误:使用人为因素框架对文献进行的系统回顾。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e058219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058219.
3
Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection.结直肠切除术后吻合口失败患者治疗过程中的认知错误。
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Jan 23;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0184-6. eCollection 2019.
4
Rethinking bias and truth in evidence-based health care.重新审视循证医疗中的偏见与真相。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Oct;24(5):930-938. doi: 10.1111/jep.13010. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
5
Thinking in Pharmacy Practice: A Study of Community Pharmacists' Clinical Reasoning in Medication Supply Using the Think-Aloud Method.药学实践中的思维:一项运用出声思维法对社区药剂师在药品供应中的临床推理进行的研究。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Dec 31;6(1):1. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6010001.
6
Probability or Reasoning: Current Thinking and Realistic Strategies for Improved Medical Decisions.概率与推理:改善医疗决策的当前思考与现实策略
Korean J Fam Med. 2017 Nov;38(6):315-321. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2017.38.6.315. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
What You Find Depends on How You Measure It: Reactivity of Response Scales Measuring Predecisional Information Distortion in Medical Diagnosis.你所发现的取决于你如何衡量:用于测量医学诊断中决策前信息失真的反应量表的反应性。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162562. eCollection 2016.
8
Teaching metacognition in clinical decision-making using a novel mnemonic checklist: an exploratory study.使用新型记忆检查表在临床决策中教授元认知:一项探索性研究。
Singapore Med J. 2016 Dec;57(12):694-700. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016015. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
9
Understanding Decision Making in Critical Care.理解重症监护中的决策制定。
Clin Med Res. 2015 Dec;13(3-4):156-68. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2015.1289. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
10
Educational agenda for diagnostic error reduction.减少诊断错误的教育议程。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii28-ii32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001622. Epub 2013 Jun 13.