Ventura Mario, Mudge Jonathan M, Palumbo Valeria, Burn Sally, Blennow Elisabeth, Pierluigi Mauro, Giorda Roberto, Zuffardi Orsetta, Archidiacono Nicoletta, Jackson Michael S, Rocchi Mariano
Sezione di Genetica-DAPEG, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Genome Res. 2003 Sep;13(9):2059-68. doi: 10.1101/gr.1155103. Epub 2003 Aug 12.
The existence of latent centromeres has been proposed as a possible explanation for the ectopic emergence of neocentromeres in humans. This hypothesis predicts an association between the position of neocentromeres and the position of ancient centromeres inactivated during karyotypic evolution. Human chromosomal region 15q24-26 is one of several hotspots where multiple cases of neocentromere emergence have been reported, and it harbors a high density of chromosome-specific duplicons, rearrangements of which have been implicated as a susceptibility factor for panic and phobic disorders with joint laxity. We investigated the evolutionary history of this region in primates and found that it contains the site of an ancestral centromere which became inactivated about 25 million years ago, after great apes/Old World monkeys diverged. This inactivation has followed a noncentromeric chromosomal fission of an ancestral chromosome which gave rise to phylogenetic chromosomes XIV and XV in human and great apes. Detailed mapping of the ancient centromere and two neocentromeres in 15q24-26 has established that the neocentromere domains map approximately 8 Mb proximal and 1.5 Mb distal of the ancestral centromeric region, but that all three map within 500 kb of duplicons, copies of which flank the centromere in Old World Monkey species. This suggests that the association between neocentromere and ancestral centromere position on this chromosome may be due to the persistence of recombinogenic duplications accrued within the ancient pericentromere, rather than the retention of "centromere-competent" sequences per se. The high frequency of neocentromere emergence in the 15q24-26 region and the high density of clinically important duplicons are, therefore, understandable in the light of the evolutionary history of this region.
潜伏着丝粒的存在被认为是人类新着丝粒异位出现的一种可能解释。该假说预测新着丝粒的位置与核型进化过程中失活的古老着丝粒的位置之间存在关联。人类染色体区域15q24 - 26是已报道多例新着丝粒出现的几个热点区域之一,它含有高密度的染色体特异性重复子,其重排被认为是伴有关节松弛的惊恐和恐惧症的易感性因素。我们研究了该区域在灵长类动物中的进化历史,发现它包含一个祖先着丝粒的位点,该位点在大约2500万年前大猿/旧世界猴分化后失活。这种失活是在一条祖先染色体的非着丝粒染色体分裂之后发生的,这条祖先染色体在人类和大猿中产生了系统发育染色体XIV和XV。对15q24 - 26中古老着丝粒和两个新着丝粒的详细定位表明,新着丝粒区域大约位于祖先着丝粒区域近端8 Mb和远端1.5 Mb处,但所有三个都位于重复子的500 kb范围内,在旧世界猴物种中,这些重复子的拷贝位于着丝粒两侧。这表明该染色体上新着丝粒与祖先着丝粒位置之间的关联可能是由于古老着丝粒周围积累的重组重复子的持续存在,而不是“着丝粒胜任”序列本身的保留。因此,鉴于该区域的进化历史,15q24 - 26区域新着丝粒出现的高频率以及临床上重要重复子的高密度是可以理解的。