Cramer C J, Truhlar D G
U.S. Army Chemical Research Development and Engineering Center, Physics Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1992 Dec;6(6):629-66. doi: 10.1007/BF00126219.
Two new continuum solvation models have been presented recently, and in this paper they are explained and reviewed in detail with further examples. Solvation Model 2 (AM1-SM2) is based on the Austin Model 1 and Solvation Model 3 (PM3-SM3) on the Parameterized Model 3 semiempirical Hamiltonian. In addition to the incorporation of phosphorus parameters, both of these new models address specific deficiencies in the original Solvation Model 1 (AM1-SM1), viz., (1) more accurate account is taken of the hydrophobic effect of hydrocarbons, (2) assignment of heavy-atom surface tensions is based on the presence or absence of bonded hydrogen atoms, and (3) the treatment of specific hydration-shell water molecules is more consistent. The new models offer considerably improved performance compared to AM1-SM1 for neutral molecules and essentially equivalent performance for ions. The solute charges within the Parameterized Model 3 Hamiltonian limit the utility of PM3-SM3 for compounds containing nitrogen and possibly phosphorus. For other systems both AM1-SM2 and PM3-SM3 give realistic results, but AM1-SM2 in general outperforms PM3-SM3. Key features of the models are discussed with respect to alternative approaches.
最近提出了两种新的连续介质溶剂化模型,本文将结合更多实例对它们进行详细解释和综述。溶剂化模型2(AM1-SM2)基于奥斯汀模型1,溶剂化模型3(PM3-SM3)基于参数化模型3半经验哈密顿量。除了纳入磷参数外,这两种新模型还解决了原始溶剂化模型1(AM1-SM1)中的特定缺陷,即:(1)更准确地考虑了烃类的疏水效应;(2)重原子表面张力的分配基于键合氢原子的存在与否;(3)对特定水合层水分子的处理更加一致。与AM1-SM1相比,新模型对中性分子的性能有了显著提高,对离子的性能基本相当。参数化模型3哈密顿量中的溶质电荷限制了PM3-SM3对含氮和可能含磷化合物的实用性。对于其他系统,AM1-SM2和PM3-SM3都给出了实际结果,但总体而言AM1-SM2优于PM3-SM3。文中还针对其他替代方法讨论了这些模型的关键特征。