Garrison Mark W
College of Pharmacy, Washington State University Spokane, 310 North Riverpoint Boulevard, P.O. Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210-1495, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Sep;52(3):503-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg380. Epub 2003 Aug 13.
Levofloxacin has good coverage against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Recent reports demonstrate enhanced activity associated with a higher 750 mg dosage of levofloxacin. The objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the activity of common regimens of levofloxacin (500 mg) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg), and a higher 750 mg levofloxacin regimen against penicillin susceptible and non-susceptible strains of S. pneumoniae.
An in vitro pharmacodynamic modelling apparatus (PDMA) characterized specific bacterial kill profiles for simulated regimens of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against four strains of S. pneumoniae. Total log reduction, time for 3-log reduction and AUC/MIC were determined.
Ciprofloxacin was less effective than the levofloxacin regimens against all four study isolates. Ciprofloxacin produced 3-log reduction in only one isolate compared with all four isolates with the levofloxacin regimens. Bacterial regrowth did not occur over 12 h with levofloxacin; however, three of four isolates demonstrated bacterial regrowth with ciprofloxacin. None of the isolates were cleared from the PDMA by ciprofloxacin. The 500 mg levofloxacin regimen cleared two of four isolates and the 750 mg dose of levofloxacin cleared all study isolates. Respective AUC/MIC values for levofloxacin (500 and 750 mg) and ciprofloxacin were 44-89, 63-126 and < or =13, which correlated well with bacterial kill data.
Both levofloxacin regimens were more effective than ciprofloxacin against the study isolates tested. The 750 mg levofloxacin regimen generated more favourable bacterial killing compared with the 500 mg levofloxacin regimen. In addition to using the 750 mg levofloxacin dose for nosocomial infections, this dose may also prove useful for the management of resistant pneumococcal infections.
左氧氟沙星对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体均有良好的覆盖范围。近期报告显示,较高剂量750mg的左氧氟沙星具有增强的活性。本研究的目的是比较评估左氧氟沙星(500mg)和环丙沙星(500mg)的常用方案,以及较高剂量750mg的左氧氟沙星方案对青霉素敏感和不敏感的肺炎链球菌菌株的活性。
一种体外药效学建模装置(PDMA)表征了左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星模拟方案对四株肺炎链球菌的特定细菌杀灭曲线。测定了总对数减少量、3对数减少时间和AUC/MIC。
环丙沙星对所有四株研究分离株的效果均不如左氧氟沙星方案。与左氧氟沙星方案的所有四株分离株相比,环丙沙星仅使一株分离株出现3对数减少。左氧氟沙星在12小时内未出现细菌再生长;然而,四株分离株中有三株在使用环丙沙星时出现细菌再生长。环丙沙星未从PDMA中清除任何分离株。500mg左氧氟沙星方案清除了四株分离株中的两株,750mg剂量的左氧氟沙星清除了所有研究分离株。左氧氟沙星(500mg和750mg)和环丙沙星各自的AUC/MIC值分别为44 - 89、63 - 126和≤13,这与细菌杀灭数据相关性良好。
两种左氧氟沙星方案对所测试的研究分离株均比环丙沙星更有效。750mg左氧氟沙星方案与500mg左氧氟沙星方案相比,产生了更有利的细菌杀灭效果。除了将750mg左氧氟沙星剂量用于医院感染外,该剂量可能也有助于治疗耐药肺炎球菌感染。