Xu Lan, Alarcón Claudio, Cöl Seda, Massagué Joan
Cell Biology Program and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 24;278(43):42569-77. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307601200. Epub 2003 Aug 13.
Smad proteins undergo rapid nuclear translocation upon stimulation by transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) and in so doing transduce the signal into the nucleus. In this report we unraveled nuclear import mechanisms of Smad3 and Smad4 that are dependent on their interaction with FG-repeat-containing nucleoporins such as CAN/Nup214, without the involvement of importin molecules that are responsible for most of the known nuclear import events. A surface hydrophobic corridor within the MH2 domain of Smad3 is critical for association with CAN/Nup214 and nuclear import, whereas Smad4 interaction with CAN/Nup214, and nuclear import requires structural elements present only in the full-length Smad4. As exemplified by the different susceptibility to inhibition of import by cytoplasmic retention factor SARA (Smad anchor for receptor activation), such utilization of distinct domains for nuclear import of Smad3 and Smad4 suggests that nuclear transport of Smad3 and Smad4 is subject to control by different retention factors.
在受到转化生长因子-β(TGFβ)刺激后,Smad蛋白会迅速发生核转位,从而将信号传导至细胞核内。在本报告中,我们揭示了Smad3和Smad4的核输入机制,该机制依赖于它们与含FG重复序列的核孔蛋白(如CAN/Nup214)的相互作用,而不涉及负责大多数已知核输入事件的输入蛋白分子。Smad3的MH2结构域内的一个表面疏水通道对于与CAN/Nup214的结合及核输入至关重要,而Smad4与CAN/Nup214的相互作用及核输入则需要仅存在于全长Smad4中的结构元件。正如细胞质滞留因子SARA(受体激活的Smad锚定蛋白)对输入抑制的不同敏感性所例证的那样,Smad3和Smad4利用不同结构域进行核输入表明,Smad3和Smad4的核转运受不同滞留因子的控制。