McLean N, Griffin S, Toney K, Hardeman W
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Sep;27(9):987-1005. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802383.
To conduct a descriptive systematic review into the nature and effectiveness of family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions.
We searched Medline and Psyclit for English language papers describing randomised trials with at least 1-y follow-up that evaluated interventions incorporating a family-based component. Studies involving people with eating disorders, learning disabilities and undernutrition or malnutrition were excluded. Data were extracted on characteristics of the participants, study design, target behaviours, nature of the intervention and study outcomes. A taxonomy was developed and used to classify family involvement in behaviour change interventions. Interventions were also classified according to an existing taxonomy that characterised the behaviour change techniques employed.
A total of 21 papers describing 16 intervention studies were identified. Studies were small (mean sample size: 52), heterogeneous, poorly described but with few losses to follow-up (median 15%). The majority were North American and aimed at weight loss. Few studies described a theoretical underpinning to the behaviour change techniques employed. There was a suggestion that spouse involvement increased effectiveness but that adolescents achieved greater weight loss when treated alone. In studies including children, beneficial effects were seen when greater numbers of behaviour change techniques were taught to both parents and children.
Relatively few intervention studies exist in this important area, particularly studies targeting adolescents, and they highlight continued uncertainty about how best to involve family members. The studies provide limited support for the involvement of spouses. They suggest that parental involvement is associated with weight loss in children, and that use of a greater range of behaviour change techniques improves weight outcomes for both parents and children. The development of future interventions and assessment of factors influencing effectiveness may be improved by paying careful attention to which family members are targeted and how they are involved in the intervention in terms of setting goals for behaviour change, providing support and training in behaviour change techniques.
对家庭参与体重控制、体重维持及减肥干预措施的性质和效果进行描述性系统评价。
我们在Medline和Psyclit数据库中检索英文论文,这些论文描述了至少有1年随访期的随机试验,评估了包含家庭因素的干预措施。排除涉及饮食失调、学习障碍以及营养不良或营养不足人群的研究。提取了关于参与者特征、研究设计、目标行为、干预措施性质和研究结果的数据。制定了一个分类法,用于对家庭参与行为改变干预措施进行分类。干预措施还根据现有的分类法进行分类,该分类法对所采用的行为改变技术进行了描述。
共识别出21篇描述16项干预研究的论文。研究规模较小(平均样本量:52),具有异质性,描述欠佳,但随访损失较少(中位数为15%)。大多数研究来自北美,旨在减肥。很少有研究描述所采用的行为改变技术的理论基础。有迹象表明,配偶参与可提高效果,但青少年单独接受治疗时体重减轻更多。在涉及儿童的研究中,当向父母和儿童传授更多行为改变技术时,可看到有益效果。
在这一重要领域,干预研究相对较少,尤其是针对青少年的研究,它们凸显了在如何让家庭成员最佳参与方面仍存在不确定性。这些研究对配偶参与的支持有限。它们表明,父母参与与儿童体重减轻有关,采用更多种类的行为改变技术可改善父母和儿童的体重结果。通过仔细关注针对哪些家庭成员以及他们如何在行为改变目标设定、提供支持和行为改变技术培训方面参与干预,可能会改进未来干预措施的制定以及对影响效果因素的评估。