Suppr超能文献

欧洲硬皮病研究小组制定系统性硬化症疾病活动标准。III. 初步活动标准的结构效度评估。

European Scleroderma Study Group to define disease activity criteria for systemic sclerosis. III. Assessment of the construct validity of the preliminary activity criteria.

作者信息

Valentini G, Bencivelli W, Bombardieri S, D'Angelo S, Della Rossa A, Silman A J, Black C M, Czirjak L, Nielsen H, Vlachoyiannopoulos P G

机构信息

U.O. di Reumatologia, Second University of Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Sep;62(9):901-3. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.901.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To further assess the construct validity of the three European Scleroderma Study Group (EScSG) preliminary activity indices for systemic sclerosis (SSc): for SSc as a whole, for diffuse SSc (dcSSc), and for limited SSc (lcSSc).

METHODS

30/290 SSc clinical charts collected for the EScSG study used to develop activity criteria for SSc were selected and sent to four clinical experts in SSc. The experts ranked the charts from 1 to 30 (1=lowest activity, 30=highest activity). The relationships among the ranks given by each investigator and each of the three scores, and between any two of the ranks were investigated.

RESULTS

A consistently significant correlation (r(s)=0.530-0.712) was found between the ranks given by each of the four investigators and the index for the entire patient group. A similar level of agreement was detected between each couple of the four experts (r(s)=0.428-0.720). Moreover, the ranks given in patients with an index >3 were significantly higher than those given for patients with an index < or =3. This cut off point had previously been shown to best discriminate patients with active disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the originally developed activity indexes, the whole series index has been externally validated. The index comprises the first preliminary, but necessary, groundwork to improve the concept of disease activity in SSc, which is still ill defined. It can be used as a preliminary activity index in clinical investigational studies.

摘要

目的

进一步评估欧洲硬皮病研究组(EScSG)针对系统性硬化症(SSc)的三个初步活动指数的结构效度,这三个指数分别针对整体SSc、弥漫性SSc(dcSSc)和局限性SSc(lcSSc)。

方法

从为EScSG研究收集的用于制定SSc活动标准的30/290份SSc临床图表中进行选择,并将其发送给四位SSc临床专家。专家们将这些图表从1到30进行排序(1 = 最低活动度,30 = 最高活动度)。研究了每位研究者给出的排序与三个分数中的每一个之间的关系,以及任意两个排序之间的关系。

结果

在四位研究者各自给出的排序与整个患者组的指数之间发现了一致的显著相关性(r(s)=0.530 - 0.712)。在四位专家中的每两位之间也检测到了类似程度的一致性(r(s)=0.428 - 0.720)。此外,指数>3的患者的排序显著高于指数≤3的患者的排序。先前已证明这个截断点最能区分患有活动性疾病的患者。

结论

在最初制定的活动指数中,整个系列指数已得到外部验证。该指数构成了改善SSc疾病活动概念的首个初步但必要的基础工作,而SSc的疾病活动概念仍定义不明确。它可在临床研究中用作初步活动指数。

相似文献

4
Performance of the 2017 EUSTAR activity index in an scleroderma cohort.2017年EUSTAR活动指数在硬皮病队列中的表现。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Dec;39(12):3701-3705. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05126-z. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
Do We Have Good Activity Indices in Systemic Sclerosis?我们在系统性硬化症中有好的活动指数吗?
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2022;18(1):39-47. doi: 10.2174/1573397117666210913102759.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验