Suppr超能文献

按测试类型和信度方法划分的信度系数,以及低信度的临床意义。

A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability.

作者信息

Charter Richard A

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, CA 90822, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 2003 Jul;130(3):290-304. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601160.

Abstract

The author presented descriptive statistics for 937 reliability coefficients for various reliability methods (e.g., alpha) and test types (e.g., intelligence). He compared the average reliability coefficients with the reliability standards that are suggested by experts and found that most average reliabilities were less than ideal. Correlations showed that over the past several decades there has been neither a rise nor a decline in the value of internal consistency, retest, or interjudge reliability coefficients. Of the internal consistency approaches, there has been an increase in the use of coefficient alpha, whereas use of the split-half method has decreased over time. Decision analysis and true-score confidence intervals showed how low reliability can result in clinical decision errors.

摘要

作者展示了针对各种可靠性方法(如阿尔法系数)和测试类型(如智力测试)的937个可靠性系数的描述性统计数据。他将平均可靠性系数与专家建议的可靠性标准进行了比较,发现大多数平均可靠性低于理想水平。相关性分析表明,在过去几十年中,内部一致性、重测或评判间可靠性系数的值既没有上升也没有下降。在内部一致性方法中,阿尔法系数的使用有所增加,而随着时间的推移,分半法的使用有所减少。决策分析和真分数置信区间显示了低可靠性如何导致临床决策错误。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验