• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按测试类型和信度方法划分的信度系数,以及低信度的临床意义。

A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability.

作者信息

Charter Richard A

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, CA 90822, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 2003 Jul;130(3):290-304. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601160.

DOI:10.1080/00221300309601160
PMID:12926514
Abstract

The author presented descriptive statistics for 937 reliability coefficients for various reliability methods (e.g., alpha) and test types (e.g., intelligence). He compared the average reliability coefficients with the reliability standards that are suggested by experts and found that most average reliabilities were less than ideal. Correlations showed that over the past several decades there has been neither a rise nor a decline in the value of internal consistency, retest, or interjudge reliability coefficients. Of the internal consistency approaches, there has been an increase in the use of coefficient alpha, whereas use of the split-half method has decreased over time. Decision analysis and true-score confidence intervals showed how low reliability can result in clinical decision errors.

摘要

作者展示了针对各种可靠性方法(如阿尔法系数)和测试类型(如智力测试)的937个可靠性系数的描述性统计数据。他将平均可靠性系数与专家建议的可靠性标准进行了比较,发现大多数平均可靠性低于理想水平。相关性分析表明,在过去几十年中,内部一致性、重测或评判间可靠性系数的值既没有上升也没有下降。在内部一致性方法中,阿尔法系数的使用有所增加,而随着时间的推移,分半法的使用有所减少。决策分析和真分数置信区间显示了低可靠性如何导致临床决策错误。

相似文献

1
A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability.按测试类型和信度方法划分的信度系数,以及低信度的临床意义。
J Gen Psychol. 2003 Jul;130(3):290-304. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601160.
2
Study samples are too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients.研究样本太小,无法得出足够精确的信度系数。
J Gen Psychol. 2003 Apr;130(2):117-29. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601280.
3
[Determination of reliability of psychometric tests in psychiatry using canonical correlation].[使用典型相关分析确定精神病学中心理测量测试的可靠性]
Psychiatr Prax. 2003 May;30 Suppl 2:S157-60.
4
Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.为研究目的实现足够高的测试分数可靠性的统计方法。
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jul;135(3):241-51. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.3.241-251.
5
WAIS-III reliability data for clinical groups.临床群体的韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)信度数据。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Nov;7(7):862-6.
6
[The appraisal of reliability and validity of subjective workload assessment technique and NASA-task load index].[主观工作量评估技术与美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数的信效度评估]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2005 Jun;23(3):178-81.
7
[Determination of Reliability of Psychometric Tests in Psychiatry Using Canonical Correlation].[使用典型相关分析确定精神病学心理测量测试的可靠性]
Psychiatr Prax. 2003 May;30(Suppl 2):157-160. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39772.
8
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-2.25) in Quebec: reliability findings in light of the MECA study.魁北克儿童诊断访谈量表(DISC - 2.25):基于MECA研究的信效度结果
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;37(11):1167-74. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199811000-00016.
9
Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.土耳其偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷的效度和信度。
Headache. 2004 Sep;44(8):786-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04146.x.
10
Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients.对信度、可推广性和效度系数进行精确估计所需的样本量。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999 Aug;21(4):559-66. doi: 10.1076/jcen.21.4.559.889.

引用本文的文献

1
Workers' satisfaction with health surveillance: Development and validation of a new scale.员工对健康监测的满意度:一种新量表的开发与验证
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jun 21;9:100368. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100368. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Validation, Content Validity, and Reliability of the Spanish SE-OAM Questionnaire: Assessing Nursing Self-Efficacy in Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Management.西班牙SE-OAM问卷的效度、内容效度和信度:评估口服抗凝治疗管理中的护理自我效能
Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):111. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15060111.
3
A review of the validation of the Brief Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis in Latin America.
拉丁美洲多发性硬化症简易认知评估的验证综述。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025 Jun 19;11(2):20552173251350724. doi: 10.1177/20552173251350724. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
Content validation of a questionnaire on healthcare personnel's perceptions of technologies.一份关于医护人员对技术认知的调查问卷的内容效度验证
Rev Cuid. 2024 Dec 19;16(1):e4145. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.4145. eCollection 2025 Jan-Apr.
5
Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT 2: theory, rationale, and initial findings.使用梅耶-萨洛维-卡鲁索情绪智力量表第二版测量情绪智力:理论、基本原理及初步研究结果
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 2;16:1539785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539785. eCollection 2025.
6
Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire: reliability generalization meta-analysis of Cronbach's alpha.幼儿口腔健康影响量表(ECOHIS)问卷:Cronbach's α系数的可靠性概括性元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 9;25(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06342-2.
7
The CarerQol Instrument: A Systematic Review, Validity Analysis, and Generalization Reliability Study.护理者生活质量量表:系统评价、效度分析及概化信度研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 12;14(6):1916. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061916.
8
Transcultural Adaptation and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the FCR7 Questionnaire for Assessing Fear of Recurrence in Cancer Patients: FCR6/7-SP.用于评估癌症患者复发恐惧的FCR7问卷西班牙语版本(FCR6/7-SP)的跨文化调适及心理测量学特性评估
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;17(5):875. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050875.
9
Civic engagement among adolescents: Spanish adaptation and validation of the civic engagement scale.青少年的公民参与:公民参与量表的西班牙语改编与验证
Am J Community Psychol. 2025 Sep;76(1-2):66-77. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12796. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
10
Psychometric network analysis of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2) in Peruvian adults.秘鲁成年人内感受性觉知多维评估量表第二版(MAIA-2)的心理测量网络分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 15;13(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02480-y.