Talarico Jennifer M, Rubin David C
Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):455-61. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02453.
On September 12, 2001, 54 Duke students recorded their memory of first hearing about the terrorist attacks of September 11 and of a recent everyday event. They were tested again either 1, 6, or 32 weeks later. Consistency for the flashbulb and everyday memories did not differ, in both cases declining over time. However, ratings of vividness, recollection, and belief in the accuracy of memory declined only for everyday memories. Initial visceral emotion ratings correlated with later belief in accuracy, but not consistency, for flashbulb memories. Initial visceral emotion ratings predicted later posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Flashbulb memories are not special in their accuracy, as previously claimed, but only in their perceived accuracy.
2001年9月12日,54名杜克大学的学生记录了他们首次听闻9·11恐怖袭击以及近期一件日常事件时的记忆。在1周、6周或32周后,他们再次接受测试。闪光灯记忆和日常记忆的一致性并无差异,两种记忆都会随时间推移而下降。然而,只有日常记忆的生动性、回忆和对记忆准确性的信念评分会下降。对于闪光灯记忆,最初的本能情绪评分与后来对准确性的信念相关,但与一致性无关。最初的本能情绪评分可预测后来的创伤后应激障碍症状。闪光灯记忆在准确性方面并不像之前所宣称的那样特殊,只是在人们感知到的准确性方面较为特殊。