• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏盲患者驾车之八:振动触觉辅助系统对人行横道场景中安全性及注视行为的影响

Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.

作者信息

Hölzl Roman, Steckhan Lorenz, Lehsing Christian, Savage Steven W, Bowers Alex R

机构信息

Technical University of Munich.

Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Safety (Basel). 2021 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.3390/safety7010018. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

DOI:10.3390/safety7010018
PMID:34765674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8579432/
Abstract

People with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs), the loss of vision in the same half of the visual field in both eyes, are permitted to drive in some jurisdictions. However, the HVFD may cause difficulties in detecting hazards approaching on the side of the field loss (the blind side). An advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) could assist with hazard detection, but little research has been conducted to evaluate the potential benefits of an ADAS for visually impaired drivers. We developed a prototype vibro-tactile assistance system for drivers with HVFDs and conducted a proof-of-concept driving simulation study to evaluate the system. Given that pedestrian accidents are the second most frequent cause of death in road traffic and most of those accidents occur in urban scenarios, we evaluated the potential of the assistance system to improve responses to pedestrian hazards in a city environment. Sixteen participants, of which eight had HVFDs and eight had normal vision, took part. Our analyses evaluated the effects of the driver assistance system, crossing direction and pedestrian behavior on the safety of pedestrian events and the participant's gaze behavior at each of the 256 crossing situations. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to assess binomial outcome variables. Despite the limited sample size, the results suggest that the vibro-tactile directional warnings were effective in directing the drivers' gaze so that they were looking in the necessary direction before a potential hazard occurred. More time was spent fixating pedestrians on the blind side when the ADAS was engaged and as a result, the safety of street crossings from the blind side improved. The effect of the ADAS was greater on responses to pedestrians from the blind than the seeing side. With an activated ADAS, crossings from the participants' blind sides were as safe as from their seeing sides, and as safe as the crossings when normally-sighted participants were driving. The results suggest that the vibro-tactile ADAS is a promising approach to improve the safety of drivers with HVFD and surrounding traffic.

摘要

患有同向性视野缺损(HVFDs)的人,即双眼视野同一半侧的视力丧失,在一些司法管辖区被允许驾驶。然而,HVFD可能会导致在检测视野缺损一侧(盲区)接近的危险时出现困难。先进的驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)可以协助进行危险检测,但很少有研究评估ADAS对视障驾驶员的潜在益处。我们为患有HVFDs的驾驶员开发了一种原型振动触觉辅助系统,并进行了一项概念验证驾驶模拟研究来评估该系统。鉴于行人事故是道路交通事故中第二大常见死亡原因,且大多数此类事故发生在城市场景中,我们评估了该辅助系统在城市环境中改善对行人危险反应的潜力。16名参与者参加了研究,其中8人患有HVFDs,8人视力正常。我们的分析评估了驾驶辅助系统、交叉方向和行人行为对行人事件安全性以及在256种交叉情况中每种情况下参与者注视行为的影响。使用广义线性混合效应模型来评估二项式结果变量。尽管样本量有限,但结果表明,振动触觉定向警告有效地引导了驾驶员的视线,使他们在潜在危险发生前看向必要的方向。当ADAS启动时,更多时间用于注视盲区的行人,因此,从盲区过马路的安全性得到了提高。ADAS对来自盲区行人的反应的影响比对可见侧行人的反应更大。在ADAS启动的情况下,参与者从盲区过马路与从可见侧过马路一样安全,并且与视力正常的参与者驾驶时过马路一样安全。结果表明,振动触觉ADAS是一种有前途的方法,可以提高患有HVFD的驾驶员及其周围交通的安全性。

相似文献

1
Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.偏盲患者驾车之八:振动触觉辅助系统对人行横道场景中安全性及注视行为的影响
Safety (Basel). 2021 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.3390/safety7010018. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.偏盲患者驾车研究X:交叉交通对十字路口注视行为和行人反应的影响
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 11;16:938140. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.938140. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of simulated mild vision loss on gaze, driving and interaction behaviors in pedestrian crossing situations.模拟轻度视力损失对行人穿越情境中注视、驾驶和交互行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:138-151. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Drivers' performance assessment approaching pedestrian crossings through the analysis of the speed and perceptive data recorded during on-field tests.通过分析现场测试期间记录的速度和感知数据来评估驾驶员接近人行横道时的表现。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 6;10(1):e24249. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24249. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
5
Effectiveness of augmented reality warnings on driving behaviour whilst approaching pedestrian crossings: A driving simulator study.增强现实警告对接近人行横道时驾驶行为的有效性:驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Nov;147:105760. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105760. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Assessment pedestrian crossing safety using vehicle-pedestrian interaction data through two different approaches: Fixed videography (FV) vs In-Motion Videography (IMV).使用两种不同方法(固定摄影法(FV)与动态摄影法(IMV))通过车-人交互数据评估行人横道安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105661. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105661. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
7
Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.行人-驾驶员在有标记的交叉口的沟通和决策策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018.
8
Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction in a mixed-street environment using a driving simulator.使用驾驶模拟器分析混合街道环境中驾驶员与行人的互动。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Truck drivers' behavior in encounters with vulnerable road users at intersections: Results from a test-track experiment.卡车司机在交叉口与弱势道路使用者相遇时的行为:测试轨道实验的结果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106289. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106289. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
10
How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.驾驶员如何超越行人?来自现场测试和自然驾驶数据的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105494. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105494. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Directional vibro-tactile hazard warnings for drivers with vision impairments.针对视力障碍驾驶员的定向振动触觉危险警告。
Assist Technol. 2025 Jul 2:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2025.2520781.
2
A systematic review on visual scanning behaviour in hemianopia considering task specificity, performance improvement, spontaneous and training-induced adaptations.对视区偏盲视觉扫描行为的系统评价:考虑任务特异性、性能改善、自发性和训练诱导适应。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(15):3221-3242. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2243590. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The Drives for Driving Simulation: A Scientometric Analysis and a Selective Review of Reviews on Simulated Driving Research.驾驶模拟的驱动因素:科学计量分析与模拟驾驶研究综述的选择性回顾
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00917. eCollection 2020.
2
Effects of simulated mild vision loss on gaze, driving and interaction behaviors in pedestrian crossing situations.模拟轻度视力损失对行人穿越情境中注视、驾驶和交互行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:138-151. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
3
Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?偏盲患者驾车研究之五:偏盲患者是否会根据不同的危险检测需求自发调整注视扫描?
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 23;6(5):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.5.11. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.同向性视野缺损患者的驾驶情况:文献综述
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Sep;99(5):402-18. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12425. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.驾驶员是否应在无自动化的带宽范围内操作?评估具有不同权限级别的触觉转向支持系统。
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):5-20. doi: 10.1177/0018720814563602.
6
Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation.具有同侧偏盲的患者在驾驶模拟的自然环境下的代偿性眼和头运动。
J Neurol. 2015 Feb;262(2):316-25. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7554-x. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
7
Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.伴有旁中心同向性视野缺损的驾驶员的危险检测:一项小型病例系列研究。
J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec 6;2011(Suppl 5):1.
8
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
9
Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.驾驶半盲:三、模拟环境下对静止和靠近的行人的检测。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jan 20;55(1):368-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12737.
10
A pilot evaluation of on-road detection performance by drivers with hemianopia using oblique peripheral prisms.一项关于使用斜向周边棱镜的偏盲驾驶员道路检测性能的初步评估。
Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:176806. doi: 10.1155/2012/176806. Epub 2012 Dec 20.