• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非比例风险下平均回归效应的估计

Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards.

作者信息

Xu R, O'Quigley J

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2000 Dec;1(4):423-39. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.423.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.423
PMID:12933565
Abstract

We present an estimator of average regression effect under a non-proportional hazards model, where the regression effect of the covariates on the log hazard ratio changes with time. In the absence of censoring, the new estimate coincides with the usual partial likelihood estimate, both estimates being consistent for a parameter having an interpretation as an average population regression effect. In the presence of an independent censorship, the new estimate is still consistent for this same population parameter, whereas the partial likelihood estimate will converge to a different quantity that depends on censoring. We give an approximation of the population average effect as integral beta(t)dF(t). The new estimate is easy to compute, requiring only minor modifications to existing softwares. We illustrate the use of the average effect estimate on a breast cancer dataset from Institut Curie. The behavior of the estimator, its comparison with the partial likelihood estimate, as well as the approximation by integral beta(t)dF(t)are studied via simulation.

摘要

我们提出了一种在非比例风险模型下平均回归效应的估计方法,其中协变量对对数风险比的回归效应随时间变化。在无删失的情况下,新估计值与通常的偏似然估计值一致,这两种估计值对于一个可解释为总体平均回归效应的参数都是一致的。在存在独立删失的情况下,新估计值对于同一个总体参数仍然是一致的,而偏似然估计值将收敛到一个依赖于删失的不同量。我们给出了总体平均效应的一个近似值,即积分β(t)dF(t)。新估计值易于计算,只需对现有软件进行微小修改。我们说明了在居里研究所的一个乳腺癌数据集上使用平均效应估计值的情况。通过模拟研究了估计量的行为、它与偏似然估计值的比较以及积分β(t)dF(t)的近似值。

相似文献

1
Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards.非比例风险下平均回归效应的估计
Biostatistics. 2000 Dec;1(4):423-39. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.423.
2
Inference for the proportional hazards model with misclassified discrete-valued covariates.具有错误分类离散值协变量的比例风险模型的推断
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):324-34. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00176.x.
3
A regression-based method for estimating mean treatment cost in the presence of right-censoring.一种用于在存在右删失情况下估计平均治疗成本的基于回归的方法。
Biostatistics. 2000 Sep;1(3):299-313. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.299.
4
An estimator for the proportional hazards model with multiple longitudinal covariates measured with error.一种用于具有测量误差的多个纵向协变量的比例风险模型的估计量。
Biostatistics. 2002 Dec;3(4):511-28. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.4.511.
5
Maximum likelihood estimation for Cox's regression model under nested case-control sampling.嵌套病例对照抽样下Cox回归模型的最大似然估计
Biostatistics. 2004 Apr;5(2):193-206. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/5.2.193.
6
Joint estimation of time-dependent and non-linear effects of continuous covariates on survival.连续协变量对生存时间依赖性和非线性效应的联合估计。
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 30;26(2):392-408. doi: 10.1002/sim.2519.
7
Explained randomness in proportional hazards models.比例风险模型中的解释性随机性。
Stat Med. 2005 Feb 15;24(3):479-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.1946.
8
Non-parametric estimation for baseline hazards function and covariate effects with time-dependent covariates.具有时间相依协变量的基线风险函数和协变量效应的非参数估计。
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):857-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.2574.
9
Logistic regression of family data from retrospective study designs.回顾性研究设计中家庭数据的逻辑回归
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;25(3):177-89. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10267.
10
The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression.通过加权Cox回归估计平均风险比。
Stat Med. 2009 Aug 30;28(19):2473-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.3623.

引用本文的文献

1
Out-of-home care placement, psychiatric disorders, and risk of homelessness: a population-based cohort study.院外护理安置、精神疾病与无家可归风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jul 22;56:101381. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101381. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Time-To-Event Analyses in Randomized Controlled Trials Under Non-Proportional Hazards.非比例风险下随机对照试验中事件发生时间分析的统计方法比较
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e70019. doi: 10.1002/sim.70019.
3
Adiposity and mortality among intensive care patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 respiratory conditions: a cross-context comparison study in the UK.
新冠肺炎和非新冠肺炎呼吸疾病重症监护患者的肥胖与死亡率:英国跨情境比较研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 13;22(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03598-3.
4
Win Statistics in Observational Cancer Research: Integrating Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.观察性癌症研究中的获胜统计:整合临床和生活质量结果
J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3272. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113272.
5
Regression models for average hazard.平均风险的回归模型。
Biometrics. 2024 Mar 27;80(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae037.
6
Causal interpretation of the hazard ratio in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中风险比的因果解释。
Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;21(5):623-635. doi: 10.1177/17407745241243308. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
7
Methods for non-proportional hazards in clinical trials: A systematic review.临床试验中非比例风险方法:系统评价。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1069-1092. doi: 10.1177/09622802241242325. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
8
The built-in selection bias of hazard ratios formalized using structural causal models.使用结构因果模型形式化的风险比的内在选择偏差。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2024 Apr;30(2):404-438. doi: 10.1007/s10985-024-09617-y. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Incident cardiovascular-kidney disease, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycaemia and mortality in adult-onset type 1 diabetes: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Hong Kong.成人起病1型糖尿病患者的心血管-肾脏疾病、糖尿病酮症酸中毒、低血糖及死亡率:香港一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Mar 16;34:100730. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100730. eCollection 2023 May.
10
Psychiatric visits during the postpartum year in women with eating disorders who continue or discontinue antidepressant treatment in pregnancy.在妊娠期间继续或停止使用抗抑郁药物的进食障碍女性中,产后一年内的精神科就诊情况。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Mar;56(3):582-594. doi: 10.1002/eat.23877. Epub 2022 Dec 16.