Suppr超能文献

[不同麻醉方式对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胃肠动力的影响]

[Effect of different anesthesias on gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

作者信息

Liao Qin, Wang Ming-an, Ouyang Wen

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.

出版信息

Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2003 Feb 28;28(1):73-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of three different anesthesias on gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

Forty-two patients undergoing LC were randomly allocated to the combined epidural-general anesthesia group (Group A, n = 14), propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia group (Group B, n = 14) and isoflurane-based inhalational-intravenous general anesthesia group (Group G, n = 14). The concentration of plasma motilin was measured; the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the first flatus time were observed; and the in-hospital day was recorded.

RESULTS

  1. The concentration of plasma motilin increased significantly during the first 1 h postoperatively (P < 0.05), but it had no significant difference in the 48 h after operation (P > 0.05) in comparison with the preoperative data in the three groups. The concentration of plasma motilin in Group C was much higher than that in the other two groups during the first 1 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). 2. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was much higher in Group C than that in the other two groups during the first 6 h postoperatively (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the 6 h after operation in the three groups (P > 0.05). 3. The first flatus time and in-hospital day postoperatively had no statistical difference in the three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Different anesthesias do not influence the recovery of intestinal motion and in-hospital day postoperatively; the combined epidural-general anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia may be ideal anesthesias because of the lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

摘要

目的

比较三种不同麻醉方式对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后胃肠动力的影响。

方法

42例行LC的患者被随机分为硬膜外-全身联合麻醉组(A组,n = 14)、丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉组(B组,n = 14)和异氟烷静吸复合全身麻醉组(C组,n = 14)。测定血浆胃动素浓度;观察术后恶心呕吐发生率及首次排气时间;记录住院天数。

结果

  1. 术后1 h内三组血浆胃动素浓度均显著升高(P < 0.05),但术后48 h与术前相比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。术后1 h内C组血浆胃动素浓度显著高于其他两组(P < 0.05)。2. 术后6 h内C组术后恶心呕吐发生率显著高于其他两组(P < 0.05),但术后6 h三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。3. 三组术后首次排气时间和住院天数差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。

结论

不同麻醉方式对术后肠道运动恢复及住院天数无影响;硬膜外-全身联合麻醉和丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉因术后恶心呕吐发生率较低可能是理想的麻醉方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验