Liao Qin, Wang Ming-an, Ouyang Wen
Department of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2003 Feb 28;28(1):73-5.
To compare the effect of three different anesthesias on gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Forty-two patients undergoing LC were randomly allocated to the combined epidural-general anesthesia group (Group A, n = 14), propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia group (Group B, n = 14) and isoflurane-based inhalational-intravenous general anesthesia group (Group G, n = 14). The concentration of plasma motilin was measured; the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the first flatus time were observed; and the in-hospital day was recorded.
Different anesthesias do not influence the recovery of intestinal motion and in-hospital day postoperatively; the combined epidural-general anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia may be ideal anesthesias because of the lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
比较三种不同麻醉方式对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后胃肠动力的影响。
42例行LC的患者被随机分为硬膜外-全身联合麻醉组(A组,n = 14)、丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉组(B组,n = 14)和异氟烷静吸复合全身麻醉组(C组,n = 14)。测定血浆胃动素浓度;观察术后恶心呕吐发生率及首次排气时间;记录住院天数。
不同麻醉方式对术后肠道运动恢复及住院天数无影响;硬膜外-全身联合麻醉和丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉因术后恶心呕吐发生率较低可能是理想的麻醉方式。