Ray Richard, Luchies Carl, Frens Margaret Abfall, Hughes Wendy, Sturmfels Richard
Hope College, Holland, MI.
J Athl Train. 2002 Jun;37(2):172-177.
Immediate rescue breathing, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, may be necessary for the cervical spine-injured football player without removal of the helmet. The purpose of our study was to compare 2 pocket-mask insertion techniques with a face-mask rotation technique to determine which allowed the quickest initiation of rescue breathing with the least cervical spine motion. DESIGN AND SETTING: In a biomechanics laboratory, 3 airway-preparation techniques were tested: chin-insertion technique (pocket mask inserted between the chin and face mask), eye-hole-insertion technique (pocket mask inserted through the face mask eye hole), and screwdriver technique (side loop straps removed using manual screwdriver followed by mask rotation). SUBJECTS: One athletic trainer team and 12 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III football players. MEASUREMENTS: Time to initiate rescue breathing and induced helmet motion. RESULTS: Both pocket-mask techniques allowed quicker initiation of rescue breathing. Cervical spine anterior-posterior displacement was greater for the chin technique than for the screwdriver or eye-hole techniques. Lateral translation was greater for the screwdriver technique than for either pocket-mask technique. Peak displacement from initial cervical spine position was greater for the chin technique than for the eye-hole technique. CONCLUSIONS: Both pocket-mask techniques allowed quicker initiation of rescue breathing than did rotation of the face mask via loop strap screw removal. The eye-hole insertion technique was faster and produced less cervical spine motion than the other 2 techniques. Each technique produced significantly smaller amounts of cervical spine displacement than that caused by cutting face-mask loop straps as reported earlier. We suggest a protocol for field management of cervical spine injuries in football players.
对于颈椎受伤的橄榄球运动员,在不摘除头盔的情况下可能需要立即进行人工呼吸或心肺复苏。我们研究的目的是比较两种口袋面罩插入技术与一种面罩旋转技术,以确定哪种技术能以最少的颈椎活动最快开始人工呼吸。
在生物力学实验室,测试了三种气道准备技术:下巴插入技术(口袋面罩插入下巴和面罩之间)、眼孔插入技术(口袋面罩通过面罩眼孔插入)和螺丝刀技术(使用手动螺丝刀拆除侧环带,然后旋转面罩)。
一个运动训练团队和12名美国国家大学体育协会第三分区的橄榄球运动员。
开始人工呼吸的时间和诱发的头盔运动。
两种口袋面罩技术都能更快开始人工呼吸。下巴技术导致的颈椎前后位移大于螺丝刀技术或眼孔技术。螺丝刀技术导致的横向平移大于两种口袋面罩技术中的任何一种。下巴技术导致的颈椎初始位置的峰值位移大于眼孔技术。
两种口袋面罩技术比通过拆除环带螺丝旋转面罩能更快开始人工呼吸。眼孔插入技术比其他两种技术更快且产生的颈椎活动更少。与之前报道的切断面罩环带相比,每种技术产生的颈椎位移量都显著更小。我们提出了一个橄榄球运动员颈椎损伤现场处理的方案。