Suppr超能文献

接受间歇性输注正性肌力药物治疗的患者症状改善情况:一项双盲安慰剂对照试验性研究

Symptomatic improvement in patients treated with intermittent infusion of inotropes: a double-blind placebo controled pilot study.

作者信息

López-Candales Angel, Vora Tushar, Gibbons William, Carron Christine, Simmons Paula, Schwartz Jeffrey

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Med. 2002;33(1-4):129-46.

Abstract

The safety and benefit of outpatient inotrope infusions in intractable heart failure remains controversial. Accordingly a prospective double blind, crossover randomization scheme was utilized in stable patients with heart failure but intractable symptoms. A total of 29 patients (mean age 66 +/- 13 years, with a mean left ventricular systolic function of 18 +/- 9%, New York Heart Association class 3.6 +/- 0.5) met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria to receive intravenous milrinone, dobutamine, or matching placebo. Safety evaluations including routine laboratory studies, physical examinations, electrocardiographic monitoring, vital signs, assessment of quality of life scores using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, six-minute walk tests, and echocardiographic assessments were performed. All 29 patients completed the weaning protocol without adverse events (mean of 27.3 +/- 11.8 treatments per patient). Patients initially assigned to milrinone received fewer treatment sessions (19 +/- 8 versus 31 +/- 12 (dobutamine) and 33 +/- 10 (placebo); p<0.02. Furthermore, only 10% of the patients treated with milrinone required crossover randomization compared to 27% patients assigned to dobutamine and 75% patients assigned to placebo. A statistically significant reduction in quality of life scores (60 +/- 20 versus 35 +/- 18; p < 0.00001) with an increase in 6-minute walk test assessments (959 +/- 431 versus 1269 +/- 469; p < 0.01) was noted. Most importantly, in patients assigned to inotropes a 23% increase in 6-minute walk test scores was noted at the end of the study when compared to baseline scores. In contrast, a reduction of -1% (p < 0.001) was noted in patients assigned to placebo. Finally, a trend that although did not reached statistical significance was noted in patients assigned to milrinone in terms of improvement in left ventricular systolic function, reduction in the severity of mitral regurgitation and estimated right ventricular systolic pressure. These results demonstrate that outpatient infusion of inotropes appear to be safe and effective in improving heart failure symptoms, reducing need for hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Furthermore, infusion of inotropes resulted in a significant improvement on 6-minute walk test scores than placebo. It also appears that milrinone confers all these benefits sooner than dobutamine.

摘要

门诊使用正性肌力药物输注治疗顽固性心力衰竭的安全性和益处仍存在争议。因此,我们对病情稳定但有顽固性症状的心力衰竭患者采用了前瞻性双盲交叉随机方案。共有29例患者(平均年龄66±13岁,左心室收缩功能平均为18±9%,纽约心脏协会心功能分级为3.6±0.5级)符合所有纳入标准且无排除标准,接受静脉注射米力农、多巴酚丁胺或匹配的安慰剂治疗。进行了安全性评估,包括常规实验室检查、体格检查、心电图监测、生命体征、使用明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷评估生活质量评分、六分钟步行试验以及超声心动图评估。所有29例患者均完成了撤药方案,且无不良事件发生(每位患者平均接受27.3±11.8次治疗)。最初分配接受米力农治疗的患者接受的治疗次数较少(19±8次,而多巴酚丁胺组为31±12次,安慰剂组为33±10次;p<0.02)。此外,接受米力农治疗的患者中只有10%需要交叉随机分组,而分配接受多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者为27%,分配接受安慰剂治疗的患者为75%。生活质量评分有统计学意义的降低(60±20分对35±18分;p<0.00001),同时六分钟步行试验评估结果有所增加(959±431米对1269±469米;p<0.01)。最重要的是,与基线评分相比,分配接受正性肌力药物治疗的患者在研究结束时六分钟步行试验评分增加了23%。相比之下,分配接受安慰剂治疗的患者评分降低了-1%(p<0.001)。最后,在分配接受米力农治疗的患者中,虽然未达到统计学意义,但在左心室收缩功能改善、二尖瓣反流严重程度降低以及估计右心室收缩压方面有一定趋势。这些结果表明,门诊输注正性肌力药物似乎在改善心力衰竭症状、减少住院和急诊就诊需求方面是安全有效的。此外,输注正性肌力药物比安慰剂在六分钟步行试验评分方面有显著改善。而且,米力农似乎比多巴酚丁胺能更快地带来所有这些益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验