• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倍频技术视野检查法与光学散焦

Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus.

作者信息

Anderson Andrew John, Johnson Chris A

机构信息

Discoveries in Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):4147-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1076.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.02-1076
PMID:12939339
Abstract

PURPOSE

The frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimeter has no provision for introducing corrective lenses, save for the patient's spectacles, and so patients are sometimes tested in the presence of moderate levels of defocus. The effect of defocus on frequency-doubling (FD) sensitivity was determined for both the commercially available instrument and for smaller targets that may be useful in spatially localizing visual field defects. In addition, whether stimulus artifacts may be detectable in the presence of defocus was assessed.

METHODS

Detection and resolution thresholds for FD stimuli, along with detection thresholds for spatially uniform flickering stimuli, were measured in normal observers in the presence of up to +6 D of defocus. In addition, the effect of defocus on the summary indices (mean deviation [MD], and pattern standard deviation [PSD]) of both the commercial FDT perimeter and a customized perimeter with smaller, higher spatial frequency targets was determined.

RESULTS

Thresholds for conventional FD targets (0.25 cyc/deg, 25 Hz) increased 0.1 log unit with +6 D defocus, whereas thresholds for smaller, higher spatial frequency (0.5 cyc/deg) targets increased 0.4 log unit. Despite the presence of a luminance artifact in the FD stimuli, detection, and resolution thresholds remained coincident at maximum defocus, suggesting that the artifact was not detectable. MD was significantly affected by defocus for the customized FD perimeter only, and PSD was not altered for either the conventional or customized test.

CONCLUSIONS

In normal observers, optical defocus has little effect on FDT perimetry sensitivity and does not make low spatial frequency artifacts detectable. Improving the spatial resolution of FDT perimetry decreases its robustness to defocus.

摘要

目的

倍频技术(FDT)视野计除患者眼镜外,没有引入矫正镜片的装置,因此患者有时在存在中度散焦的情况下进行测试。确定了散焦对市售仪器以及对可能有助于在空间上定位视野缺损的较小目标的倍频(FD)敏感度的影响。此外,评估了在存在散焦的情况下是否可检测到刺激伪迹。

方法

在正常观察者中,在高达 +6 D 的散焦情况下,测量了 FD 刺激的检测和分辨阈值以及空间均匀闪烁刺激的检测阈值。此外,还确定了散焦对商用 FDT 视野计和具有较小、较高空间频率目标的定制视野计的汇总指标(平均偏差 [MD] 和模式标准差 [PSD])的影响。

结果

传统 FD 目标(0.25 周/度,25 Hz)的阈值在 +6 D 散焦时增加 0.1 对数单位,而较小、较高空间频率(0.5 周/度)目标 的阈值增加 0.4 对数单位。尽管 FD 刺激中存在亮度伪迹,但在最大散焦时检测和分辨阈值仍然一致,这表明该伪迹不可检测。仅定制的 FD 视野计的 MD 受散焦的显著影响,而传统或定制测试的 PSD 均未改变。

结论

在正常观察者中,光学散焦对 FDT 视野检查敏感度影响很小,并且不会使低空间频率伪迹可检测到。提高 FDT 视野检查的空间分辨率会降低其对散焦的稳健性。

相似文献

1
Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus.倍频技术视野检查法与光学散焦
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):4147-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1076.
2
Appearance of the frequency-doubling stimulus at threshold.倍频刺激在阈值时的表现。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;50(3):1477-82. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2866. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
3
Frequency-doubling technology perimetry.倍频技术视野检查法
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;16(2):213-25. doi: 10.1016/s0896-1549(03)00011-7.
4
Effect of defocus on visual field measurement.散焦对视野测量的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7(3):259-65.
5
Frequency doubling illusion VEPs and automated perimetry in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中的倍频视觉诱发电位和自动视野检查
Doc Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;113(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10633-006-9011-3. Epub 2006 Aug 12.
6
Appearance of the frequency doubling stimulus in normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.正常受试者和青光眼患者中倍频刺激的表现。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Mar;44(3):1111-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.01-1251.
7
Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.标准自动视野计、频域技术视野计和短波长自动视野计在青光眼检测中的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 21;52(10):7325-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7795.
8
Effect of localized defocus on detection thresholds for different sized targets in the fovea and periphery.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001 Feb;79(1):60-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079001060.x.
9
Effect of Optical Defocus on the Kinetic Perimetry in Young Myopic Participants.光学离焦对年轻近视参与者动态视野检查的影响。
Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(8):847-52. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.961614. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
10
Learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry.使用 Humphrey Matrix 频率加倍技术视野计对健康受试者进行视野测试中的学习效应。
Eye (Lond). 2010 May;24(5):851-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.210. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Spectacles with highly aspherical lenslets for myopia control do not change visual sensitivity in automated static perimetry.用于近视控制的带有高度非球面小透镜的眼镜不会改变自动静态视野计中的视觉敏感度。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 25;16:996908. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.996908. eCollection 2022.
2
Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response.瞳孔反应中神经元增益控制的定位
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 12;10:203. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00203. eCollection 2019.
3
Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.
鼻侧视野形状的个体差异。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Combining Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Scanning Laser Polarimetry for Glaucoma Detection.联合倍频技术视野检查和扫描激光偏振仪用于青光眼检测。
J Glaucoma. 2015 Oct-Nov;24(8):561-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000065.
5
Assessing spatial and temporal properties of perimetric stimuli for resistance to clinical variations in retinal illumination.评估周边视野刺激的空间和时间特性,以抵抗视网膜照明的临床变化。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jan 20;55(1):353-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11640.
6
Blur-resistant perimetric stimuli.抗模糊视野刺激
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90(5):466-74. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828fc91d.
7
Prevalence and characteristics of glaucoma among Korean adults.韩国成年人青光眼的患病率及特征
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;25(2):110-5. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.2.110. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
8
[Frequency-doubling technology : A new method for determining glaucomatous visual field defects].[倍频技术:一种确定青光眼视野缺损的新方法]
Ophthalmologe. 2009 Aug;106(8):709-13. doi: 10.1007/s00347-009-1957-6.
9
Frequency doubling technology threshold visual field results vary with software version.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov-Dec;51(6):448-52. doi: 10.1007/s10384-007-0469-7. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
10
Prevalence of glaucoma in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila Eye Study.缅甸农村青光眼患病率:眉谬眼科研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;91(6):710-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.107573.