Swanson William H, Dul Mitchell W, Horner Douglas G, Malinovsky Victor E
Indiana University School of Optometry, 800 East Atwater Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405-3680, United States.
SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd St, New York, NY 10036, United States.
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
Between-subject differences in the shape of the nasal visual field were assessed for 103 volunteers 21-85years of age and free of visual disorder. Perimetry was conducted with a stimulus for which contrast sensitivity is minimally affected by peripheral defocus and decreased retinal illumination. One eye each was tested for 103 volunteers free of eye disease in a multi-center prospective longitudinal study. A peripheral deviation index was computed as the difference in log contrast sensitivity at outer (25-29° nasal) and inner (8° from fixation) locations. Values for this index ranged from 0.01 (outer sensitivity slightly greater than inner sensitivity) to -0.7 log unit (outer sensitivity much lower than inner sensitivity). Mean sensitivity for the inner locations was independent of the deviation index (R<1%), while mean sensitivity for the outer locations was not (R=38%, p<0.0005). Age was only modestly related to the index, with a decline by 0.017 log unit per decade (R=10%). Test-retest data for 21 volunteers who completed 7-10 visits yielded standard deviations for the index from 0.04 to 0.17 log unit, with a mean of 0.09 log unit. Between-subject differences in peripheral deviation persisted over two years of longitudinal testing. Peripheral deviation indices were correlated with indices for three other perimetric stimuli used in a subset of 24 volunteers (R from 20% to 49%). Between-subject variability in shape of the visual field raises concerns about current clinical visual field indices, and further studies are needed to develop improved indices.
对103名年龄在21至85岁之间且无视觉障碍的志愿者的鼻侧视野形状的个体间差异进行了评估。使用一种刺激进行视野检查,对于该刺激,对比敏感度受周边离焦和视网膜照明降低的影响最小。在一项多中心前瞻性纵向研究中,对103名无眼部疾病的志愿者的每只眼睛进行了测试。计算周边偏差指数,即外侧(鼻侧25 - 29°)和内侧(距注视点8°)位置的对数对比敏感度之差。该指数的值范围从0.01(外侧敏感度略高于内侧敏感度)到 -0.7对数单位(外侧敏感度远低于内侧敏感度)。内侧位置的平均敏感度与偏差指数无关(R < 1%),而外侧位置的平均敏感度则相关(R = 38%,p < 0.0005)。年龄与该指数仅呈适度相关,每十年下降0.017对数单位(R = 10%)。21名完成7 - 10次检查的志愿者的重测数据显示,该指数的标准差为0.04至0.17对数单位,平均为0.09对数单位。个体间周边偏差差异在两年的纵向测试中持续存在。在24名志愿者的子集中,周边偏差指数与用于其他三种视野刺激的指数相关(R从20%至49%)。视野形状的个体间变异性引发了对当前临床视野指数的担忧,需要进一步研究以开发改进的指数。