Suppr超能文献

鼻侧视野形状的个体差异。

Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.

作者信息

Swanson William H, Dul Mitchell W, Horner Douglas G, Malinovsky Victor E

机构信息

Indiana University School of Optometry, 800 East Atwater Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405-3680, United States.

SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd St, New York, NY 10036, United States.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

Between-subject differences in the shape of the nasal visual field were assessed for 103 volunteers 21-85years of age and free of visual disorder. Perimetry was conducted with a stimulus for which contrast sensitivity is minimally affected by peripheral defocus and decreased retinal illumination. One eye each was tested for 103 volunteers free of eye disease in a multi-center prospective longitudinal study. A peripheral deviation index was computed as the difference in log contrast sensitivity at outer (25-29° nasal) and inner (8° from fixation) locations. Values for this index ranged from 0.01 (outer sensitivity slightly greater than inner sensitivity) to -0.7 log unit (outer sensitivity much lower than inner sensitivity). Mean sensitivity for the inner locations was independent of the deviation index (R<1%), while mean sensitivity for the outer locations was not (R=38%, p<0.0005). Age was only modestly related to the index, with a decline by 0.017 log unit per decade (R=10%). Test-retest data for 21 volunteers who completed 7-10 visits yielded standard deviations for the index from 0.04 to 0.17 log unit, with a mean of 0.09 log unit. Between-subject differences in peripheral deviation persisted over two years of longitudinal testing. Peripheral deviation indices were correlated with indices for three other perimetric stimuli used in a subset of 24 volunteers (R from 20% to 49%). Between-subject variability in shape of the visual field raises concerns about current clinical visual field indices, and further studies are needed to develop improved indices.

摘要

对103名年龄在21至85岁之间且无视觉障碍的志愿者的鼻侧视野形状的个体间差异进行了评估。使用一种刺激进行视野检查,对于该刺激,对比敏感度受周边离焦和视网膜照明降低的影响最小。在一项多中心前瞻性纵向研究中,对103名无眼部疾病的志愿者的每只眼睛进行了测试。计算周边偏差指数,即外侧(鼻侧25 - 29°)和内侧(距注视点8°)位置的对数对比敏感度之差。该指数的值范围从0.01(外侧敏感度略高于内侧敏感度)到 -0.7对数单位(外侧敏感度远低于内侧敏感度)。内侧位置的平均敏感度与偏差指数无关(R < 1%),而外侧位置的平均敏感度则相关(R = 38%,p < 0.0005)。年龄与该指数仅呈适度相关,每十年下降0.017对数单位(R = 10%)。21名完成7 - 10次检查的志愿者的重测数据显示,该指数的标准差为0.04至0.17对数单位,平均为0.09对数单位。个体间周边偏差差异在两年的纵向测试中持续存在。在24名志愿者的子集中,周边偏差指数与用于其他三种视野刺激的指数相关(R从20%至49%)。视野形状的个体间变异性引发了对当前临床视野指数的担忧,需要进一步研究以开发改进的指数。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Blur-resistant perimetric stimuli.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90(5):466-74. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828fc91d.
5
Central perimetric sensitivity estimates are directly influenced by the fixation target.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Jul;36(4):453-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12304. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 2;53(2):633-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6674. Print 2012 Feb.
7
Peripheral visual field thresholds using Humphrey Field Analyzer program 60-4 in normal eyes.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):415-21. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2011.6299.
8
The effect of a hockey visor and sports goggles on visual function.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;37(3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(02)80058-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Using high-density perimetry to explore new approaches for characterizing visual field defects.
Vision Res. 2023 Sep;210:108259. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2023.108259. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
2
Examining the concordance of retinal ganglion cell counts generated using measures of structure and function.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1338-1352. doi: 10.1111/opo.13041. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Comparison of defect depths for sinusoidal and circular perimetric stimuli in patients with glaucoma.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Jan;39(1):26-36. doi: 10.1111/opo.12598.
5
Customizing Perimetric Locations Based on En Face Images of Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundles With Glaucomatous Damage.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 15;7(2):5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.2.5. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
The Monocular Duke of Urbino.
Ophthalmol Eye Dis. 2016 Dec 11;8(Suppl 1):15-19. doi: 10.4137/OED.S40918. eCollection 2016.
7
Contrast sensitivity perimetry data from adults free of eye disease.
Data Brief. 2016 Jun 21;8:654-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.06.012. eCollection 2016 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging Glaucomatous Damage Across the Temporal Raphe.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jun;56(6):3496-504. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16730.
3
Contrast sensitivity perimetry and clinical measures of glaucomatous damage.
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Nov;91(11):1302-11. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000395.
4
6
Blur-resistant perimetric stimuli.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90(5):466-74. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828fc91d.
10
Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review.
J Vis. 2011 Dec 1;11(5):13. doi: 10.1167/11.5.13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验