Ledesma-Mateos Ismael, Barahona Ana
Historia de la Biologia, UNAM, México.
J Hist Biol. 2003 Summer;36(2):285-307. doi: 10.1023/a:1024443517547.
The aim of this work is to evaluate the role played by Alfonso Luis Herrera and Isaac Ochoterena in the institutionalization of academic biology in Mexico in the early 20th century. As biology became institutionalized in Mexico, Herrera's basic approach to biology was displaced by Isaac Ochoterena's professional goals due to the prevailing political conditions at the end of the 1929. The conflict arose from two different conceptions of biology, because Herrera and Ochoterena had different discourses that were incommensurable, not only linguistically speaking, but also socioprofessionally. They had different links to influential groups related to education, having distinct political and socioprofessional interests. The conflict between Herrera and Ochoterena determined the way in which professional biology education has developed in Mexico, as well as the advancement in specific research subjects and the neglect of others.
这项工作的目的是评估阿方索·路易斯·埃雷拉和艾萨克·奥乔特伦纳在20世纪初墨西哥学术生物学制度化过程中所扮演的角色。随着生物学在墨西哥实现制度化,由于20世纪20年代末的政治环境,埃雷拉对生物学的基本方法被艾萨克·奥乔特伦纳的职业目标所取代。冲突源于对生物学的两种不同概念,因为埃雷拉和奥乔特伦纳有着不同的话语,这些话语不仅在语言上不可通约,在社会职业方面也是如此。他们与教育相关的有影响力的群体有着不同的联系,有着不同的政治和社会职业利益。埃雷拉和奥乔特伦纳之间的冲突决定了墨西哥专业生物学教育的发展方式,以及特定研究课题的进展和对其他课题的忽视。