• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与釉面瓷的拉伸和剪切粘结强度

Tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement to glazed porcelain.

作者信息

Kitayama Yoshitaka, Komori Akira, Nakahara Rizako

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, The Nippon Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):451-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0451:TASBSO>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0451:TASBSO>2.0.CO;2
PMID:12940567
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement (RGIC) to glazed porcelain, to evaluate the durability of RGIC by thermal cycling, and to examine the RGIC remaining on the surface of the porcelain after the bond strength test to evaluate bonding conditions. Three adhesives were used in this study: Concise (CO) as a chemically cured composite resin, Fuji ORTHO (FO) as a chemically cured RGIC, and Fuji ORTHO LC (FOLC) as a light-cured RGIC. Tensile and shear bond strengths were measured 24 hours after bonding orthodontic brackets and also after thermal cycling. Tensile bond strength after 24 hours was 6.6 +/- 3.2 MPa in CO, 7.3 +/- 1.4 MPa in FO, and 8.6 +/- 1.9 MPa in FOLC, and the strength significantly decreased after the thermal cycling test. Shear bond strength after 24 hours was 32.5 +/- 8.9 MPa in CO, 23.3 +/- 6.8 MPa in FO, and 24.7 +/- 6.5 MPa in FOLC, and in contrast to tensile bond strength, no decreases in the strength were detected after the thermal cycling test. CO showed significantly higher shear bond strength than did FO and FOLC. When using the shear bond strength test and CO, destruction of porcelain surfaces frequently occurred after 24 hours and was observed in every specimen after the thermal cycling. RGIC was found to be an advantageous alternative to resin adhesive for bracket bonding to porcelain and to enamel.

摘要

本研究的目的是测量树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀(RGIC)与釉质瓷的拉伸和剪切粘结强度,通过热循环评估RGIC的耐久性,并在粘结强度测试后检查瓷表面残留的RGIC以评估粘结情况。本研究使用了三种粘结剂:作为化学固化复合树脂的Concise(CO)、作为化学固化RGIC的Fuji ORTHO(FO)和作为光固化RGIC的Fuji ORTHO LC(FOLC)。在粘结正畸托槽24小时后以及热循环后测量拉伸和剪切粘结强度。24小时后的拉伸粘结强度在CO中为6.6±3.2MPa,在FO中为7.3±1.4MPa,在FOLC中为8.6±1.9MPa,热循环测试后强度显著降低。24小时后的剪切粘结强度在CO中为32.5±8.9MPa,在FO中为23.3±6.8MPa,在FOLC中为24.7±6.5MPa,与拉伸粘结强度相反,热循环测试后未检测到强度降低。CO显示出比FO和FOLC显著更高的剪切粘结强度。当使用剪切粘结强度测试和CO时,24小时后瓷表面经常发生破坏,热循环后在每个标本中均观察到。发现RGIC是用于托槽粘结到瓷和釉质的树脂粘结剂的有利替代品。

相似文献

1
Tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement to glazed porcelain.树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与釉面瓷的拉伸和剪切粘结强度
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):451-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0451:TASBSO>2.0.CO;2.
2
A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.使用树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀和双酚A甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯(bis-GMA)树脂粘合剂时,粘结在釉面和去釉瓷表面的托槽的剪切粘结强度比较。
World J Orthod. 2006 Summer;7(2):134-7.
3
Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.使用等离子弧光和树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀进行正畸托槽粘结
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jul;120(1):58-63. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.115148.
4
Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.正畸托槽与瓷的粘结:粘结系统的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jan;89(1):66-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.63.
5
Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.三种粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽之间的剪切粘结强度比较。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):457-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0457:COSBSO>2.3.CO;2.
6
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.
7
Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.用于正畸粘结的一种复合体和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的实验室评估。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):58-63; discussion 64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0058:LEOACA>2.3.CO;2.
8
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.光固化填充封闭剂对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024.
9
Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.使用不同光固化和自固化粘结剂时正畸托槽的粘结强度
Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):56-63. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0056:BSOOBU>2.0.CO;2.
10
Adhesive thickness effects on the bond strength of a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement.粘结剂厚度对光固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结强度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):254-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0250:ATEOTB>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the pain experienced during orthodontic treatment and bracket removal depend on the architecture of the bracket or debonding method?正畸治疗及去除托槽过程中所经历的疼痛是否取决于托槽的结构或去粘结方法?
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Dec 4;47(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae073.
2
Safe Debonding of Fixed Appliances: A Comparison of Traditional Techniques and LODI Devices on Different Bracket Types in Terms of Enamel Cracks, Site of Bond Failure, and Bracket Reusability.固定矫治器的安全脱卸:传统技术与 LODI 器械在不同托槽类型的釉质裂、粘结失败部位和托槽再使用率方面的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910267.
3
Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review.
正畸粘结至瓷质材料:一项系统评价
Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):555-60. doi: 10.2319/083013-636.1. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
A Comparative Study of the Shear and Tensile Bond Strength using three types of Direct Bonding Adhesives on Stainless Steel Brackets - An In Vitro Study.使用三种直接粘结剂对不锈钢托槽进行剪切和拉伸粘结强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Aug;5(4):26-9. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
5
Tensile bond strength of metal bracket bonding to glazed ceramic surfaces with different surface conditionings.不同表面处理条件下金属托槽与釉质陶瓷表面的拉伸粘结强度。
J Dent (Tehran). 2011 Fall;8(4):201-8. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
Assessment of Bond Strength between Metal Brackets and Non-Glazed Ceramic in Different Surface Treatment Methods.不同表面处理方法下金属托槽与无釉陶瓷之间粘结强度的评估
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Spring;7(2):64-70. Epub 2010 Jun 30.