Zoellner Lori A, Sacks Matthew B, Foa Edna B
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Aug;112(3):508-14. doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.3.508.
Current research of posttrauma sequelae suggests that intrusive rather than avoidant-dissociative models more accurately represent the encoding processes of trauma cues. However, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is often conceptualized as a phasic phenomenon, altering between arousal and avoidance states. The failure to support a relationship between avoidant encoding style and PTSD may reflect this alteration. To explore this hypothesis, participants with PTSD and controls (no PTSD) completed an item-cued directed-forgetting task, following either a dissociative or a serenity (control) mood induction. Results suggested that, following the serenity induction, a standard directed-forgetting effect was observed. However, following the dissociation induction, this effect was not observed. The role of dissociation in impairing encoding via lack of selective rehearsal or source discrimination is discussed.
当前关于创伤后遗症的研究表明,侵入性而非回避性-解离性模型更准确地反映了创伤线索的编码过程。然而,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)通常被概念化为一种阶段性现象,在唤醒和回避状态之间交替。未能支持回避性编码风格与PTSD之间的关系可能反映了这种交替。为了探讨这一假设,患有PTSD的参与者和对照组(无PTSD)在经历解离性或平静(对照)情绪诱导后,完成了一项项目线索定向遗忘任务。结果表明,在平静诱导后,观察到了标准的定向遗忘效应。然而,在解离诱导后,未观察到这种效应。本文讨论了解离通过缺乏选择性复述或来源辨别对编码造成损害的作用。