• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术:通过客观测量技能来确定学习曲线。

Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.

作者信息

Chang L, Satava R M, Pellegrini C A, Sinanan M N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356410, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1744-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6. Epub 2003 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6
PMID:12958686
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of new devices into surgical practice often requires that surgeons acquire and master new skills. We studied the learning curve for intracorporeal knot tying in robotic surgery.

METHODS

We developed an objective scoring system to evaluate knot tying and tested eight attending surgeons during 3 weeks of training on a surgical robot. Each performed intracorporeal knot tying tasks both before and after robotic skills training. These performances were compared to their laparoscopic knots and analyzed to determine and define skill improvement.

RESULTS

Baseline laparoscopic knot completion took 140 sec (range, 47-432), with a mean composite score of 77 (100 possible), whereas robotic knot tying took 390 sec, with a mean composite score of 40. After initial robotic training, times decreased by 65% to 139 sec and scores increased to 71. With more training, completion times and composite scores were improved and errors were reduced.

CONCLUSION

Like any new technology, surgical robotics requires dedicated training to achieve mastery. Initially, even experienced laparoscopists may register an inferior performance. However, after adequate training, surgeons can exceed their laparoscopic performance, completing intracorporeal knots better and faster using robotics.

摘要

背景

将新设备应用于外科手术通常要求外科医生掌握新技能。我们研究了机器人手术中体内打结的学习曲线。

方法

我们开发了一种客观评分系统来评估打结情况,并在外科机器人上对8名主治医生进行了为期3周的培训测试。每位医生在机器人技能培训前后都进行了体内打结任务。将这些表现与他们的腹腔镜打结情况进行比较,并进行分析以确定和定义技能提高情况。

结果

腹腔镜打结基线完成时间为140秒(范围47 - 432秒),平均综合评分为77分(满分100分),而机器人打结时间为390秒,平均综合评分为40分。经过初步机器人培训后,时间减少65%至139秒,评分提高到71分。随着更多培训,完成时间和综合评分得到改善,错误减少。

结论

与任何新技术一样,手术机器人技术需要专门培训才能掌握。最初,即使是经验丰富的腹腔镜医生也可能表现较差。然而,经过充分培训后,外科医生使用机器人技术可以超越他们的腹腔镜手术表现,更好更快地完成体内打结。

相似文献

1
Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.机器人手术:通过客观测量技能来确定学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1744-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
2
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: implications for training.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术技能的习得:对培训的启示
J Endourol. 2005 Nov;19(9):1098-103. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1098.
3
Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying.开发一种用于腹腔镜缝合和体内打结技术技能的客观结构化评估方法。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?腹腔镜血管吻合术:机器人(宙斯-伊索)辅助是否有助于克服学习曲线?
Surg Endosc. 2005 Aug;19(8):1071-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2178-3. Epub 2005 May 26.
5
Axial-spin technique of endoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: comparison with the conventional technique and objective assessment of knot security, learning curves, and performance efficiency across training levels.内镜体内打结的轴向旋转技术:与传统技术的比较以及对结安全性、学习曲线和不同训练水平下操作效率的客观评估
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Apr;19(2):157-64. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31819f318b.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic skills development: formal versus informal training.机器人辅助腹腔镜技能发展:正式培训与非正式培训。
J Endourol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1351-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0511.
7
Evaluation of a novel modified suture material designed to facilitate intracorporeal knot tying during laparoscopic surgery.一种新型改良缝合材料的评估,该材料旨在便于腹腔镜手术中的体内打结。
J Endourol. 2005 Nov;19(9):1104-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1104.
8
Construct validity of an objective assessment method for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying.腹腔镜体内缝合与打结客观评估方法的结构效度。
Am J Surg. 2008 Jul;196(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.058. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
9
Real-time objective assessment of knot quality with a portable tensiometer is superior to execution time for assessment of laparoscopic knot-tying performance.使用便携式张力计对结质量进行实时客观评估,在评估腹腔镜打结性能方面优于执行时间。
Surg Innov. 2005 Sep;12(3):233-7. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200308.
10
Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.基于计算机的腹腔镜和机器人手术模拟器:性能特征及新用户的看法
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9805-3. Epub 2008 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Real Life Evolution of Surgical Approaches in the Management of Endometrial Cancer in Poland.波兰子宫内膜癌治疗中手术方法的现实演变
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;17(16):2626. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162626.
2
Robot-Assisted Heller Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助Heller肌切开术与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Nov 8;15(11):e48495. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48495. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.虚拟现实训练可提高手术室表现:一项随机双盲研究的结果
Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008.
2
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?机器人手术技能与腹腔镜手术技能的比较:学习曲线是否存在差异?
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):39-45; discussion 45. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01717-x.
3
The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery.
评价机器人手术技术评估中的客观工具和人工智能:系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad331.
4
Acceptance of Endoscopes in Otology - An Indian Perspective and Review of the Literature.耳科学中内镜的应用——印度视角及文献综述
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar 29;27(4):e713-e722. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759577. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
[The application of Da Vinci surgical system in pediatric otolaryngology head and neck surgery].[达芬奇手术系统在小儿耳鼻咽喉头颈外科手术中的应用]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan;36(1):63-67. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.01.015.
6
Training residents in robotic thoracic surgery.培训住院医师进行机器人辅助胸外科手术。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6169-6178. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rts-06.
7
Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.机器人辅助对行复杂微创手术缝合任务的外科受训者的心理工作量和认知表现的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2551-2559. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07038-9. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Continuous 389 cases of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: experience in Shanghai Chest Hospital.达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌389例连续病例:上海胸科医院经验
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(6):3776-3782. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.80.
9
Training in robotic thoracic surgery.机器人辅助胸外科手术培训。
J Vis Surg. 2018 Jan 4;4:1. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.12.12. eCollection 2018.
10
Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.验证 VBLaST 样式裁剪任务:学习曲线研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1990-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
腹腔镜手术的陷阱:机器人手术和远程机器人手术面临的挑战。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Feb;12(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00001.
4
Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks.在执行标准化任务时,手动与机器人辅助(宙斯系统)腹腔镜手术的效率比较。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9012-y. Epub 2001 Nov 16.
5
Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.定义腹腔镜结直肠切除术的学习曲线。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Feb;44(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02234296.
6
Minimally invasive and robotic surgery.微创与机器人手术。
JAMA. 2001 Feb 7;285(5):568-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.5.568.
7
An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.一种用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的客观评分系统。
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Dec;189(6):566-74. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00218-5.
8
Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks.在进行基本操作和缝合任务时,手动腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的对比。
Arch Surg. 1998 Sep;133(9):957-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.957.
9
Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.一种用于腹腔镜技能培训与评估的模型的开发。
Am J Surg. 1998 Jun;175(6):482-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00080-4.
10
Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术的技能获取与评估
Arch Surg. 1997 Feb;132(2):200-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260098021.