Bunn F, Collier T, Frost C, Ker K, Roberts I, Wentz R
University of Hertfordshire, Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, Hatfield, Herts, UK.
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):200-4. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.200.
To assess whether area-wide traffic calming schemes can reduce road crash related deaths and injuries.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, Sociological Abstracts Science (and social science) citation index, National Technical Information service, Psychlit, Transport Research Information Service, International Road Research Documentation, and Transdoc, and web sites of road safety organisation were searched; experts were contacted, conference proceedings were handsearched, and relevant reference lists were checked.
Randomised controlled trials, and controlled before/after studies of area-wide traffic calming schemes designed to discourage and slow down through traffic on residential roads.
Data were collected on road user deaths, injuries, and traffic crashes. For each study rate ratios were calculated, the ratio of event rates before and after intervention in the traffic calmed area divided by the corresponding ratio of event rates in the control area, which were pooled to give an overall estimate using a random effects model.
Sixteen controlled before/after studies met our inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported the number of road user deaths: pooled rate ratio 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 2.59). Sixteen studies reported the number of injuries (fatal and non-fatal): pooled rate ratio 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00). All studies were in high income countries.
Area-wide traffic calming in towns and cities has the potential to reduce road traffic injuries. However, further rigorous evaluations of this intervention are needed, especially in low and middle income countries.
评估区域交通 calming 方案是否能减少与道路交通事故相关的死亡和伤害。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
检索了Cochrane损伤组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Medline、EMBASE、社会学文摘科学(和社会科学)引文索引、国家技术信息服务处、Psychlit、交通研究信息服务处、国际道路研究文献库和Transdoc,以及道路安全组织的网站;联系了专家,手工检索了会议论文集,并检查了相关参考文献列表。
随机对照试验,以及针对旨在劝阻和减缓住宅道路上过境交通的区域交通 calming 方案的前后对照研究。
收集道路使用者死亡、受伤和交通事故的数据。对于每项研究,计算率比,即交通 calmed 区域干预前后事件发生率的比值除以对照区域相应事件发生率的比值,并使用随机效应模型进行汇总,以给出总体估计值。
16项前后对照研究符合我们的纳入标准。8项研究报告了道路使用者死亡人数:汇总率比为0.63(95%置信区间(CI)0.14至2.59)。16项研究报告了受伤人数(致命和非致命):汇总率比为0.89(95%CI 0.80至1.00)。所有研究均在高收入国家进行。
城镇的区域交通 calming 有减少道路交通伤害的潜力。然而,需要对这种干预措施进行进一步严格的评估,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。