• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方案:道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距地图。

PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.

作者信息

Mohan Dinesh, Tiwari Geetam, Varghese Mathew, Bhalla Kavi, John Denny, Saran Ashrita, White Howard

机构信息

TRIPP, Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi India.

Head Orthopaedics Department St. Stephen's Hospital New Delhi India.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 2;16(1):e1077. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1077. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/cl2.1077
PMID:37131973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8356311/
Abstract

The Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020, officially proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in March 2010, sought to reduce morbidity and mortality due to road traffic injuries (RTI) significantly. While there is reasonable agreement internationally on safer designs of motor vehicles (except locally produced vehicles like three-wheeled scooter taxis, tuk-tuks, jeepneys, etc.), there is a lack of evidence based interventions in road and infrastructure design, police enforcement and post-crash care. Researchers in the field of traffic safety have been aware of the existence of counterintuitive results in their area of work for more than four decades. The fact that many interventions do not result in reductions in RTI is mainly because a large number of studies only measure intermediate outcomes like change in behaviour or knowledge and not the actual results in the field. The scope of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is to cover relevant studies in road safety sector from all countries and present the effectiveness of interventions in terms of mainly traffic crash injuries as its outcome. The interventions adopted in this EGM are classified into five broad categories: Human factors, vehicle factors and protective devices, road design, infrastructure and traffic control, post-crash pre-hospital care and legal and institutional framework. In order to come closer to accomplishing targets for road safety, it is important to allocate resources to promote interventions that are effective in achieving outcomes in the context of road safety. A mapping will provide a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge in the area of road safety and its effectiveness across the world. The map will guide programme managers to high quality evidence and inform targeted commissioning of future research.

摘要

2011 - 2020年道路安全行动十年由联合国大会于2010年3月正式宣布,旨在大幅降低道路交通伤害(RTI)导致的发病率和死亡率。虽然国际上对于机动车更安全的设计(除了三轮摩的、嘟嘟车、吉普尼等本地生产的车辆)有合理的共识,但在道路和基础设施设计、警察执法以及事故后护理方面缺乏基于证据的干预措施。交通安全领域的研究人员在其工作领域中已经意识到存在违反直觉的结果超过四十年了。许多干预措施未能降低道路交通伤害的主要原因是大量研究仅衡量行为或知识的变化等中间结果,而不是实际的现场结果。本证据与差距地图(EGM)的范围是涵盖所有国家道路安全领域的相关研究,并以主要的交通碰撞伤害为结果呈现干预措施的有效性。本EGM采用的干预措施分为五大类:人为因素、车辆因素及防护装置、道路设计、基础设施与交通控制、事故后院前护理以及法律和制度框架。为了更接近实现道路安全目标,重要的是分配资源以促进在道路安全背景下有效实现结果的干预措施。一份地图将全面概述道路安全领域及其在全球范围内有效性的现有知识。该地图将指导项目经理获取高质量证据,并为未来研究的针对性委托提供信息。

相似文献

1
PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.方案:道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距地图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 2;16(1):e1077. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1077. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Speed enforcement detection devices for preventing road traffic injuries.预防道路交通伤害的速度执法检测装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD004607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004607.pub2.
4
Dealing with existing theory: national fatality rates, vehicle standards and personal safety.应对现有理论:全国死亡率、车辆标准和个人安全。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2020 Mar;27(1):12-19. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1680565. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Explaining Chile's traffic fatality and injury reduction for 2000-2012.解析2000年至2012年智利交通事故死亡率和受伤率下降的原因。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S56-63. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.939270.
6
Evidence and gap map of studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for people with disabilities in low-and middle-income countries.评估中低收入国家残疾人干预措施有效性的研究证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;16(1):e1070. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1070. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
[Evidence-based effectiveness of road safety interventions: a literature review].[道路安全干预措施的循证有效性:文献综述]
Gac Sanit. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(6):553.e1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
8
Injuries as a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology and prospects for control.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的伤害作为一个公共卫生问题:流行病学与控制前景
East Afr Med J. 2000 Dec;77(12 Suppl):S1-43.
9
Traffic police officers' experience of post-crash care to road traffic injury victims: a qualitative study in Tanzania".交警对道路交通伤受害者的伤后护理体验:坦桑尼亚的一项定性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 11;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0274-x.
10
Cross-sectional study of road accidents and related law enforcement efficiency for 10 countries: A gap coherence analysis.10个国家道路交通事故及相关执法效率的横断面研究:差距一致性分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):686-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1146823. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban traffic accidents in Isfahan city: a study of prehospital response time intervals.伊斯法罕市的城市交通事故:院前反应时间间隔研究
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 27;17(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00800-4.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
PROTOCOL: Evidence and gap map: studies of the effectiveness of transport sector interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

本文引用的文献

1
On the relationship between road safety research and the practice of road design and operation.论道路安全研究与道路设计和运营实践之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:114-131. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
3
Can evolutionary theory explain the slow development of knowledge about the level of safety built into roads?
方案:证据与差距图:低收入和中等收入国家交通部门干预措施有效性的研究
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 7;17(1):e1136. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1136. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Studies of the effectiveness of transport sector interventions in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map.低收入和中等收入国家交通部门干预措施的有效性研究:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 27;17(4):e1203. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1203. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Human mobility behavior in COVID-19: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis.新冠疫情下的人类流动行为:系统文献综述与文献计量分析
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102916. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102916. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of curbs on crash outcomes.系统回顾和荟萃分析对碰撞结果的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(5):271-276. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2055005. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
进化理论能解释为何关于道路安全水平的知识发展缓慢吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Does prehospital management by doctors affect outcome in major trauma? A systematic review.医生进行的院前管理会影响重大创伤的预后吗?一项系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):965-974. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001559.
5
Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas.证据与差距图:促进循证政策和战略研究议程的工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
6
Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists.用于减少骑车人骑行受伤的自行车基础设施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD010415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2.
7
Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff.面向医院工作人员的高级创伤生命支持培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 22;2014(8):CD004173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004173.pub4.
8
Improving Road Safety through Deterrence-Based Initiatives: A review of research.通过基于威慑的举措提高道路安全:研究综述
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2011 Feb;11(1):29-37. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
9
Motorcycle rider training for the prevention of road traffic crashes.预防道路交通事故的摩托车骑手培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD005240. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005240.pub2.
10
Interventions in the alcohol server setting for preventing injuries.在酒类服务场所进行预防伤害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD005244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005244.pub3.