Dinman B D
J Occup Med. 1987 Apr;29(4):345-52.
The International Labor Organization (ILO) represents an historic, negotiated solution of sociopolitical problems arising from World War I. Among its functions, it develops international standards designed to improve conditions of employment. Its tripartite structure involving governments, labor, and employers inevitably impacts upon the philosophy and substance of the occupational health and safety instruments it develops. Understanding this standard-setting process provides insights into these instruments' underlying quasi-political character. The effects of these standard-setting actions upon national law and practice are broad in theory; however, their actual application reflects national human and material resources. Although ILO health and safety standards are directed toward the enhancement of occupational health and safety practice, political issues impede their widespread application despite individual national ratifications.
国际劳工组织（ILO）代表了对第一次世界大战引发的社会政治问题进行历史性协商后达成的解决方案。在其职能中，它制定旨在改善就业条件的国际标准。其涉及政府、劳工和雇主的三方结构不可避免地影响到它所制定的职业健康与安全文书的理念和实质内容。了解这一标准制定过程有助于洞察这些文书潜在的准政治性质。从理论上讲，这些标准制定行动对国家法律和实践的影响是广泛的；然而，它们的实际应用反映了国家的人力和物力资源。尽管国际劳工组织的健康与安全标准旨在加强职业健康与安全实践，但尽管各国已个别批准，政治问题仍阻碍其广泛应用。
