Suppr超能文献

A comparison of efficacy and tolerance of the short acting sedatives midazolam and zopiclone.

作者信息

Begg E J, Robson R A, Frampton C M, Campbell J E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Christchurch Hospital.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1992 Oct 28;105(944):428-9.

PMID:1297939
Abstract

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and tolerance of midazolam, 15 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg once daily for seven days in a prospective, double blind trial of 88 patients, aged 18 or over, with sleep disorders in general practice.

METHODS

Efficacy was evaluated using the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ). Adverse reactions were recorded as volunteered.

RESULTS

fifty-one patients completed all aspects of the trial without violation of the protocol. Patients taking zopiclone improved in all aspects of the Leeds questionnaire (p < 0.01). Patients taking midazolam improved in six out of 10 items (p < 0.01). Rebound insomnia was evident in the zopiclone group in five out of 10 items of the LSEQ. Rebound was not evident in the midazolam group. There were no significant differences between midazolam 15 mg, and zopiclone 7.5 mg, in comparison between groups. Thirty-eight patients suffered 49 adverse drug reactions and there were no differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Zopiclone 7.5 mg daily improved more items on the LSEQ than midazolam 15 mg daily but was associated with significant rebound insomnia. Adverse reactions were frequent with both drugs.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验