Pothel E, Just J, Tournier G, Grimfeld A
Centre de diagnostic et de traitement de l'asthme de l'enfant, Hôpital d'Enfants Armand Trousseau, Paris.
Rev Pneumol Clin. 1992;48(6):247-50.
Peak-flow measurement increasingly seems to be very useful for routine monitoring of asthma in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and reproductibility of three different peak-flow meters: Miniwright, Vitalograph and Assess. This prospective study was conducted in 100 primary school children aged from 6 to 11 years. In each child, 9 measurements of expiratory peak-flow rate (EPF) were performed with these 3 peak flow meters in a random order. Reproductibility was assessed for each instrument by the greatest divergence observed between the 3 EPF values measured in the same session. Reliability was assessed by comparison between the values obtained with each instrument and theoretical EPF values calculated from a formula which included age, sex and size. Our study validated the reliability and reproductibility of the 3 peak flow meters studied. EPF values were more scattered and less reproductible with Assess, but the difference was not significant.
峰值流速测量对于儿童哮喘的常规监测似乎越来越有用。本研究的目的是评估三种不同峰值流速仪(Miniwright、Vitalograph和Assess)的可靠性和可重复性。这项前瞻性研究在100名6至11岁的小学生中进行。对每个儿童,使用这三种峰值流速仪以随机顺序进行9次呼气峰值流速(EPF)测量。通过在同一时段测量的3个EPF值之间观察到的最大差异来评估每种仪器的可重复性。通过将每种仪器获得的值与根据包含年龄、性别和体型的公式计算出的理论EPF值进行比较来评估可靠性。我们的研究验证了所研究的这三种峰值流速仪的可靠性和可重复性。使用Assess时,EPF值更分散且可重复性较差,但差异不显著。