Suppr超能文献

[室间隔缺损时右心室收缩压的测量——与多普勒超声心动图和双心导管检查的同步相关性研究]

[Measurement of the right ventricular systolic pressure in ventricular septal defect--a simultaneous correlative study with Doppler echocardiography and dual cardiac catheterization].

作者信息

Zhang Y

机构信息

Affiliated Hospital, Shandong Medical University, Jinan.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 1992 Dec;20(6):338-40, 388.

PMID:1307967
Abstract

To assess the reliability of Doppler echocardiography (DE) in measuring the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) in ventricular septal defect (VSD), both left and right heart catheterization (Cath) and DE were performed simultaneously in 59 cases with VSD. Systolic shunt velocities through VSD were recorded by DE and converted into the peak instantaneous (delta P-PD) and mid-systolic (delta P-MD) pressure gradients using the simplified Bernoulli equation RVSP was estimated by subtracting delta P-PD from the brachial artery systolic pressure (BASP) measured by a cuff sphygmomanometer (method A) and by subtracting delta P-MD from BASP (method B). The left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), RVSP, and the peak instantaneous (delta P-PC) and the peak-to-peak (delta P-PP) pressure gradients were measured from pressure c rves. The comparison between BASP and LVSP yielded a good correlation (r = 0.90, SEE = 0.76 kPa). There were also good correlation of interventricular pressure gradients measured by two techniques (r = 0.98, SEE = 0.83-0.93 kPa). Although RVSP estimated by method A correlated well with that measured by Cath, there was a significant underestimation (P < 0.05). On the other hand, RVSP estimated by method B agreed highly with that measured by Cath and there was no significant difference between the two means. We conclude that DE offers a reliable technique for estimating RVSP in VSD noninvasively.

摘要

为评估多普勒超声心动图(DE)测量室间隔缺损(VSD)患者右心室收缩压(RVSP)的可靠性,对59例VSD患者同时进行了左、右心导管检查(Cath)和DE检查。通过DE记录VSD处的收缩期分流速度,并使用简化伯努利方程将其转换为峰值瞬时(ΔP - PD)和收缩中期(ΔP - MD)压力阶差。通过袖带血压计测量肱动脉收缩压(BASP),用BASP减去ΔP - PD(方法A)以及用BASP减去ΔP - MD(方法B)来估算RVSP。从压力曲线测量左心室收缩压(LVSP)、RVSP以及峰值瞬时(ΔP - PC)和峰 - 峰(ΔP - PP)压力阶差。BASP与LVSP之间的比较显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.90,标准误 = 0.76 kPa)。两种技术测量的心室间压力阶差也具有良好的相关性(r = 0.98,标准误 = 0.83 - 0.93 kPa)。虽然方法A估算的RVSP与Cath测量的结果相关性良好,但存在显著低估(P < 0.05)。另一方面,方法B估算的RVSP与Cath测量的结果高度一致,且两种方法的均值之间无显著差异。我们得出结论,DE为无创估算VSD患者的RVSP提供了一种可靠的技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验