Mulcahy Daniel M
US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, USA.
ILAR J. 2003;44(4):252-8. doi: 10.1093/ilar.44.4.252.
Despite the long-standing role that institutional animal care and use committees (IACUCs) have played in reviewing and approving studies at academic institutions, compliance with the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is not always complete for government natural resource agencies that use free-ranging animals in research and management studies. Even at universities, IACUCs face uncertainties about what activities are covered and about how to judge proposed research on free-ranging animals. One reason for much of the confusion is the AWA vaguely worded exemption for "field studies." In particular, fish are problematic because of the AWA exclusion of poikilothermic animals. However, most university IACUCs review studies on all animals, and the Interagency Research Animal Committee (IRAC) has published the "IRAC Principles," which extend coverage to all vertebrates used by federal researchers. Despite this extended coverage, many scientists working on wild animals continue to view compliance with the AWA with little enthusiasm. IACUCs, IACUC veterinarians, wildlife veterinarians, and fish and wildlife biologists must learn to work together to comply with the law and to protect the privilege of using free-ranging animals in research.
尽管机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUCs)在学术机构审查和批准研究方面长期发挥着作用,但对于在研究和管理研究中使用自由放养动物的政府自然资源机构而言,《动物福利法》(AWA)的合规情况并不总是完善的。即使在大学,IACUCs也面临着关于哪些活动属于涵盖范围以及如何评判关于自由放养动物的拟议研究的不确定性。造成诸多困惑的一个原因是AWA对“实地研究”的豁免措辞模糊。特别是鱼类存在问题,因为AWA将变温动物排除在外。然而,大多数大学IACUCs会审查所有动物的研究,机构间研究动物委员会(IRAC)也发布了“IRAC原则”,将涵盖范围扩大到联邦研究人员使用的所有脊椎动物。尽管有了这种扩大的涵盖范围,但许多从事野生动物研究的科学家对遵守AWA仍缺乏热情。IACUCs、IACUC兽医、野生动物兽医以及鱼类和野生动物生物学家必须学会共同努力,以遵守法律并保护在研究中使用自由放养动物的特权。