Suppr超能文献

早期莱姆病的治疗

Treatment of early Lyme disease.

作者信息

Massarotti E M, Luger S W, Rahn D W, Messner R P, Wong J B, Johnson R C, Steere A C

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1992 Apr;92(4):396-403. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90270-l.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of azithromycin, amoxicillin/probenecid, and doxycycline for the treatment of early Lyme disease, to identify risk factors for treatment failure, and to describe the serologic response in treated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with erythema migrans and two patients with flu-like symptoms alone and fourfold changes in antibody titers to Borrelia burgdorferi were randomized to receive (1) oral azithromycin, 500 mg on the first day followed by 250 mg once a day for 4 days; (2) oral amoxicillin 500 mg and probenecid 500 mg, three times a day for each for 10 days; or (3) doxcycline, 100 mg twice a day for 10 days. If symptoms were still present at 10 days, treatment was extended with amoxicillin/probenecid or doxycycline for 10 more days. Evaluations were done at study entry and 10, 30, and 180 days later.

RESULTS

Three of the patients who initially had symptoms suggestive of spread of the spirochete to the nervous system, one from each antibiotic treatment group, subsequently developed neurologic abnormalities, but symptoms in the other 54 patients resolved within 3 to 30 days after study entry. Six of the 19 patients (32%) (95% confidence interval, 13% to 57%) given amoxicillin/probenecid developed a drug eruption, whereas none of the patients given azithromycin or doxycycline had this complication. The presence of dysesthesias at study entry was the only risk factor significantly associated with treatment failure (p less than 0.001). By convalescence, 72% of the patients were seropositive, and 56% still had detectable IgM responses to the spirochete 6 months later.

CONCLUSIONS

The three antibiotic regimens tested in this study were generally effective for the treatment of early Lyme disease, but the regimens differ in the frequency of side effects and in ease of administration.

摘要

目的

比较阿奇霉素、阿莫西林/丙磺舒和多西环素治疗早期莱姆病的安全性和疗效,确定治疗失败的危险因素,并描述治疗患者的血清学反应。

患者与方法

55例游走性红斑患者、2例仅有流感样症状且抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体滴度呈四倍变化的患者被随机分为三组,分别接受以下治疗:(1)口服阿奇霉素,首日500mg,随后每日250mg,共4天;(2)口服阿莫西林500mg和丙磺舒500mg,每日三次,各服用10天;(3)多西环素,每日两次,每次100mg,共10天。若10天时症状仍存在,则用阿莫西林/丙磺舒或多西环素再延长治疗10天。在研究开始时、10天、30天和180天后进行评估。

结果

最初有螺旋体扩散至神经系统症状的3例患者,每个抗生素治疗组各1例,随后出现神经异常,但其他54例患者的症状在研究开始后3至30天内消失。接受阿莫西林/丙磺舒治疗的19例患者中有6例(32%)(95%可信区间为13%至57%)出现药疹,而接受阿奇霉素或多西环素治疗的患者均无此并发症。研究开始时存在感觉异常是与治疗失败显著相关的唯一危险因素(p<0.001)。到恢复期时,72%的患者血清学呈阳性,6个月后仍有56%的患者对螺旋体有可检测到的IgM反应。

结论

本研究中测试的三种抗生素方案对早期莱姆病的治疗总体有效,但这些方案在副作用发生率和给药便利性方面存在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验