Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素与阿莫西林治疗游走性红斑的比较。一项双盲、随机、对照试验。

Azithromycin compared with amoxicillin in the treatment of erythema migrans. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Luft B J, Dattwyler R J, Johnson R C, Luger S W, Bosler E M, Rahn D W, Masters E J, Grunwaldt E, Gadgil S D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY 11794-8160 USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1996 May 1;124(9):785-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-9-199605010-00002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether azithromycin or amoxicillin is more efficacious for the treatment of erythema migrans skin lesions, which are characteristic of Lyme disease.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Acute manifestations and sequelae were assessed using a standardized format. Baseline clinical characteristics and response were correlated with serologic results. Patients were followed for 180 days.

SETTING

12 outpatient centers in eight states.

PATIENTS

246 adult patients with erythema migrans lesions at least 5 cm in diameter were enrolled and were stratified by the presence of flu-like symptoms (such as fever, chills, headache, malaise, fatigue, arthralgias, and myalgias) before randomization.

INTERVENTION

Oral treatment with either amoxicillin, 500 mg three times daily for 20 days, or azithromycin, 500 mg once daily for 7 days. Patients who received azithromycin also received a dummy placebo so that the dosing schedules were identical.

RESULTS

Of 217 evaluable patients, those treated with amoxicillin were significantly more likely than those treated with azithromycin to achieve complete resolution of disease at day 20, the end of therapy (88% compared with 76%; P=0.024). More azithromycin recipients (16%) than amoxicillin recipients (4%) had relapse (P=0.005). A partial response at day 20 was highly predictive of relapse (27% of partial responders had relapse compared with 6% of complete responders; P<0.001). For patients treated with azithromycin, development of an antibody response increased the possibility of achieving a complete response (81% of seropositive patients achieved a complete response compared with 60% of seronegative patients; P=0.043). Patients with multiple erythema migrans lesions were more likely than patients with single erythema migrans lesions (P<0.001) to have a positive antibody titer at baseline (63% compared with 17% for IgM; 39% compared with 16% for IgG). Fifty-seven percent of patients who had relapse were seronegative at the time of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

A 20-day course of amoxicillin was found to be an effective regimen for erythema migrans. Most patients were seronegative for Borrelia burgdorferi at the time of presentation with erythema migrans (65%) and at the time of relapse (57%).

摘要

目的

确定阿奇霉素或阿莫西林对治疗莱姆病特征性的游走性红斑皮肤损害是否更有效。

设计

随机、双盲、双模拟、多中心研究。采用标准化格式评估急性表现和后遗症。将基线临床特征及反应与血清学结果进行关联分析。对患者随访180天。

地点

八个州的12个门诊中心。

患者

纳入246例直径至少5厘米的游走性红斑损害成年患者,并在随机分组前按是否存在流感样症状(如发热、寒战、头痛、不适、疲劳、关节痛和肌痛)进行分层。

干预

口服阿莫西林,每日三次,每次500毫克,共20天;或阿奇霉素,每日一次,每次500毫克,共7天。接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者还接受了虚拟安慰剂,以使给药方案相同。

结果

在217例可评估患者中,在治疗结束的第20天,接受阿莫西林治疗的患者比接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者疾病完全缓解的可能性显著更高(88%对76%;P=0.024)。阿奇霉素治疗组复发的患者(16%)多于阿莫西林治疗组(4%)(P=0.005)。第20天部分缓解是复发的高度预测因素(部分缓解者中有27%复发,而完全缓解者中为6%;P<0.001)。对于接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者,产生抗体反应增加了获得完全缓解的可能性(血清阳性患者中有81%获得完全缓解,而血清阴性患者中为60%;P=0.043)。有多发性游走性红斑损害的患者比有单发性游走性红斑损害的患者在基线时抗体滴度呈阳性的可能性更大(IgM分别为63%对17%;IgG分别为39%对16%;P<0.001)。复发患者中有57%在复发时血清阴性。

结论

发现20天疗程的阿莫西林是治疗游走性红斑的有效方案。大多数患者在出现游走性红斑时(65%)和复发时(57%)伯氏疏螺旋体血清学呈阴性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验