Ruggeri F M, Marziano M L, Salvatori E, Bisicchia R, Scardellato U, Scagnelli M, Modolo M L, Santini G, Donelli G
Laboratorio di Ultrastrutture, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Microbiologica. 1992 Jul;15(3):249-57.
One hundred stool samples from children with acute diarrhoea were examined by six commercial latex and immunoenzymatic assays for the diagnosis of rotavirus infection in four different laboratories. Samples were also analyzed by solid-phase immune electron microscopy using a rabbit anti-group A rotavirus antiserum. With electron microscopy as a basis for comparison, sensitivity and specificity for the latex and ELISA assays varied from 91.1 to 92.9% and from 94.2 to 99.4%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were revealed in the confirmation rate of electron microscopy-negative samples between different commercial assays. Significant variability was also found between results obtained by the laboratories taking part in the study.
在四个不同实验室中,使用六种商用乳胶和免疫酶测定法对100份急性腹泻儿童的粪便样本进行检测,以诊断轮状病毒感染。样本还通过使用兔抗A组轮状病毒抗血清的固相免疫电子显微镜进行分析。以电子显微镜作为比较基础,乳胶测定法和酶联免疫吸附测定法的敏感性和特异性分别在91.1%至92.9%和94.2%至99.4%之间。不同商用测定法在电子显微镜检测为阴性的样本确认率上显示出统计学上的显著差异。参与研究的各实验室所获结果之间也存在显著差异。