Suppr超能文献

间接双抗体和双抗体夹心ELISA技术与乳胶凝集试验在诊断人轮状病毒感染中的比较。

Comparison of indirect double antibody and double antibody sandwich ELISA techniques with latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of human rotavirus infection.

作者信息

Grauballe P C, Jarzabek Z

出版信息

Acta Virol. 1984 Jan;28(1):59-63.

PMID:6143499
Abstract

94 faecal samples from infants and children suffering of acute gastroenteritis were investigated for rotavirus by indirect double antibody sandwich ELISA kit (WHO, Geneva), Rotavirus ELISA kit (DAKOPATTS A/S, Copenhagen) and Rotalex latex-agglutination kit (Orion Diagnostica, Helsinki). The ELISA techniques gave almost identical results and seemed to be of same sensitivity and specificity. Rotalex agglutination had an overall agreement of 88% with ELISA. It is concluded that strongly positive reactions found by Rotalex may be regarded as true positive reactions, whereas samples producing weakly positive and/or negative reactions should be retested in a more specific and sensitive assay, such as enzyme linked immunosorbent-assay (ELISA).

摘要

采用间接双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒(世界卫生组织,日内瓦)、轮状病毒酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒(达科帕茨公司,哥本哈根)和罗塔莱克斯乳胶凝集试剂盒(奥立安诊断公司,赫尔辛基),对94份患有急性肠胃炎的婴幼儿粪便样本进行了轮状病毒检测。酶联免疫吸附测定技术得出的结果几乎相同,且似乎具有相同的灵敏度和特异性。罗塔莱克斯凝集法与酶联免疫吸附测定法的总体一致性为88%。得出的结论是,罗塔莱克斯检测出的强阳性反应可被视为真阳性反应,而产生弱阳性和/或阴性反应的样本应采用更具特异性和灵敏度的检测方法(如酶联免疫吸附测定法)重新检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验