Slifkin M, Cumbie R
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2722-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2722-2724.1992.
Histopaque-1119 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) and Plasmagel (Cellular Products, Inc., Buffalo, N.Y.) were compared as density gradient separation reagents for the separation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and mononuclear cells from blood from the isolation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). Of 200 peripheral blood specimens examined, CMV was recovered from 51 by both methods. The time of detection of immunofluorescent sites or a cytopathic effect associated with CMV was similar by each method. The Histopaque-1119 method was less time-consuming than the Plasmagel method since it did not require a precentrifugation step for the settling of erythrocytes. The use of Histopaque-1119 will permit an effective alternative single-step method for the separation of blood leukocytes for the isolation of CMV.
对用于从血液中分离多形核白细胞和单核细胞以分离巨细胞病毒(CMV)的密度梯度分离试剂Histopaque-1119(西格玛化学公司,密苏里州圣路易斯)和Plasmagel(细胞产品公司,纽约州布法罗)进行了比较。在检查的200份外周血标本中,两种方法均从51份标本中分离出了CMV。每种方法检测与CMV相关的免疫荧光位点或细胞病变效应的时间相似。Histopaque-1119方法比Plasmagel方法耗时更少,因为它不需要进行红细胞沉降的预离心步骤。使用Histopaque-1119将为分离用于CMV分离的血液白细胞提供一种有效的替代单步方法。