• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普瑞纳(Prinivil)和络活喜长效片(Procardia XL)在黑人和白人高血压患者中的疗效及耐受性比较。

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Prinivil and Procardia XL in black and white hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Weir M R, Lavin P T

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1992 Sep-Oct;14(5):730-9.

PMID:1334803
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of Prinivil and Procardia XL were compared in 135 (67 black, 68 white) patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension. The goal of therapy was to achieve and maintain a supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of > 90 mmHg or a decrease in SDBP > or = 10 mmHg. Patients received Prinivil 10 to 40 mg once daily or Procardia XL 30 to 120 mg once daily during a titration period of 2 to 8 weeks to achieve the goal blood pressure before a 4-week maintenance period. The mean baseline supine systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 151/97 mmHg in patients receiving Prinivil and 153/99 mmHg in patients receiving Procardia XL. Ninety-one percent of patients receiving Prinivil and 95% of those receiving Procardia XL achieved SDBP control at the end of titration therapy. At the end of the maintenance treatment period, 79% of patients receiving Prinivil and 80% of those receiving Procardia XL had SDBP control. Mean decreases in SDBP from baseline were comparable for both treatment groups. At the end of the titration period, mean decreases were 9.6 mmHg in patients receiving Prinivil and 11.3 mmHg in patients receiving Procardia XL; at the end of the maintenance period, mean decreases were 10.8 mmHg and 12.1 mmHg, respectively. There were no differences in treatment responses in either the black or white hypertensive subgroups. Thus both drugs were equally effective in black and white patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Both drugs were generally well tolerated, but the number of adverse experiences requiring discontinuation of therapy was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in patients receiving Procardia XL.

摘要

对135例(67例黑人、68例白人)轻度至中度单纯性原发性高血压患者比较了雅施达(Prinivil)和络活喜(Procardia XL)的疗效及耐受性。治疗目标是使仰卧位舒张压(SDBP)达到并维持>90 mmHg,或使SDBP降低>或=10 mmHg。在2至8周的滴定期内,患者每日服用一次10至40 mg雅施达或每日服用一次30至120 mg络活喜,以在4周的维持期前达到目标血压。接受雅施达治疗患者的平均基线仰卧位收缩压/舒张压为151/97 mmHg,接受络活喜治疗患者的为153/99 mmHg。滴定治疗结束时,91%接受雅施达治疗的患者和95%接受络活喜治疗的患者实现了SDBP控制。维持治疗期结束时,79%接受雅施达治疗的患者和80%接受络活喜治疗的患者实现了SDBP控制。两个治疗组SDBP较基线的平均降低幅度相当。滴定期结束时,接受雅施达治疗患者的平均降低幅度为9.6 mmHg,接受络活喜治疗患者的为11.3 mmHg;维持期结束时,平均降低幅度分别为10.8 mmHg和12.1 mmHg。黑人或白人高血压亚组的治疗反应无差异。因此,两种药物对轻度至中度原发性高血压的黑人和白人患者同样有效。两种药物总体耐受性良好,但接受络活喜治疗的患者中因不良事件需要停药的人数显著更高(P = 0.03)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Prinivil and Procardia XL in black and white hypertensive patients.普瑞纳(Prinivil)和络活喜长效片(Procardia XL)在黑人和白人高血压患者中的疗效及耐受性比较。
Clin Ther. 1992 Sep-Oct;14(5):730-9.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release verapamil in older patients with hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):401-8.
3
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release verapamil in black patients with hypertension.赖诺普利与缓释维拉帕米治疗黑人高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较。
Clin Ther. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):409-16.
4
Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy, tolerability and safety compared to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril.缬沙坦,一种用于治疗原发性高血压的新型血管紧张素II拮抗剂:与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利相比的疗效、耐受性及安全性
J Hum Hypertens. 1997 Aug;11(8):483-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000482.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of a combination of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension measured manually and with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor.依那普利与氢氯噻嗪联合用药治疗高血压的疗效及耐受性:手动测量与动态血压监测
Clin Ther. 1993 May-Jun;15(3):527-38.
6
Combination treatment with telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗黑人轻至中度高血压患者。
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Jan;24(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240111.
7
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension: a randomized, multicentre, double-blind study.奈必洛尔与赖诺普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效及耐受性评估:一项随机、多中心、双盲研究。
Blood Press Suppl. 2003 May;1:30-5. doi: 10.1080/08038020310000104.
8
Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of lisinopril compared with nifedipine in patients with mild to severe essential hypertension.赖诺普利与硝苯地平对轻至重度原发性高血压患者降压效果的比较评估。
Angiology. 1992 Jun;43(6):482-9. doi: 10.1177/000331979204300605.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of long-acting nifedipine GITS/OROS monotherapy or combination therapy in hypertensive patients: results of a 12-week international, prospective, multicentre, observational study.长效硝苯地平 GITS/OROS 单药治疗或联合治疗高血压患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 12 周的国际、前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(9):631-42. doi: 10.2165/11588970-000000000-00000.
10
Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.氯沙坦、氨氯地平和赖诺普利三种抗高血压药物对高血压患者降压效果及耐受性的前瞻性随机研究。
Heart Vessels. 2004 Jan;19(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-003-0724-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial differences in blood pressure response to calcium channel blocker monotherapy: a meta-analysis.钙通道阻滞剂单药治疗血压反应的种族差异:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2009 Aug;22(8):911-7. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.100. Epub 2009 Jun 4.