• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赖诺普利与缓释维拉帕米治疗黑人高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较。

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release verapamil in black patients with hypertension.

作者信息

Weir M R, Kong B W, Jenkins P, Lavin P T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):409-16.

PMID:1659495
Abstract

In this clinical study the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release (SR) verapamil hydrochloride were compared in black patients with mild-to-moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension. The goal of therapy was to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of less than 90 mmHg or a greater than or equal to 10-mmHg fall in SDBP. Forty-three patients completed the titration phase, 23 in the lisinopril group and 20 in the verapamil SR group. The mean baseline supine systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 147/98 mmHg for the lisinopril group and 155/100 mmHg for the verapamil SR group. At the end of a two- to eight-week titration period, 87% of the lisinopril-treated patients and 90% of the verapamil SR-treated patients had achieved SDBP control. Six patients were excluded from maintenance therapy: four in the lisinopril group (one because of urticaria and three because of failure to reach goal blood pressure) and two in the verapamil SR group (because of failure to reach goal blood pressure). After eight weeks of maintenance therapy, 68% of the lisinopril-treated patients and 72% of the verapamil SR-treated patients had achieved SDBP control. The mean decreases in SDBP were comparable for both treatment groups. At the end of titration, the mean decreases from baseline were 10.5 mmHg for the lisinopril group and 12.6 mmHg for the verapamil SR group. At the end of maintenance, the mean decreases from baseline were 7.8 mmHg for the lisinopril group and 9.2 mmHg for the verapamil SR group. Adverse experiences were few.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在这项临床研究中,对赖诺普利和缓释维拉帕米盐酸盐在患有轻度至中度单纯性原发性高血压的黑人患者中的疗效和耐受性进行了比较。治疗目标是使仰卧位舒张压(SDBP)低于90 mmHg或SDBP下降大于或等于10 mmHg。43名患者完成了滴定阶段,赖诺普利组23名,维拉帕米缓释组20名。赖诺普利组的平均基线仰卧位收缩压/舒张压为147/98 mmHg,维拉帕米缓释组为155/100 mmHg。在两至八周的滴定期结束时,87%接受赖诺普利治疗的患者和90%接受维拉帕米缓释治疗的患者实现了SDBP控制。6名患者被排除在维持治疗之外:赖诺普利组4名(1名因荨麻疹,3名因未达到目标血压),维拉帕米缓释组2名(因未达到目标血压)。经过八周的维持治疗,68%接受赖诺普利治疗的患者和72%接受维拉帕米缓释治疗的患者实现了SDBP控制。两个治疗组SDBP的平均下降幅度相当。滴定结束时,赖诺普利组从基线的平均下降幅度为10.5 mmHg,维拉帕米缓释组为12.6 mmHg。维持结束时,赖诺普利组从基线的平均下降幅度为7.8 mmHg,维拉帕米缓释组为9.2 mmHg。不良事件很少。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release verapamil in black patients with hypertension.赖诺普利与缓释维拉帕米治疗黑人高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较。
Clin Ther. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):409-16.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release verapamil in older patients with hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):401-8.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of enalapril and sustained-release verapamil in older patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.依那普利与缓释维拉帕米治疗老年轻至中度原发性高血压的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1990 Mar-Apr;12(2):139-48.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Prinivil and Procardia XL in black and white hypertensive patients.普瑞纳(Prinivil)和络活喜长效片(Procardia XL)在黑人和白人高血压患者中的疗效及耐受性比较。
Clin Ther. 1992 Sep-Oct;14(5):730-9.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of a combination of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension measured manually and with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor.依那普利与氢氯噻嗪联合用药治疗高血压的疗效及耐受性:手动测量与动态血压监测
Clin Ther. 1993 May-Jun;15(3):527-38.
6
Enalapril and lisinopril in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.依那普利和赖诺普利治疗轻至中度原发性高血压。
Clin Ther. 1990 Mar-Apr;12(2):181-90.
7
Comparison of different fixed antihypertensive combination drugs: a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study.不同固定剂量抗高血压联合用药的比较:一项双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究。
J Hypertens. 1997 Jan;15(1):87-91. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715010-00009.
8
The relationship of dose to the antihypertensive response of verapamil-sustained release in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The Verapamil-SR Study Group.轻度至中度原发性高血压患者中维拉帕米缓释片剂量与降压反应的关系。维拉帕米缓释片研究组。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 Nov;29(11):1003-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1989.tb03269.x.
9
Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension.固定复方制剂群多普利/维拉帕米缓释片:用于原发性高血压的综述
Drugs. 2002;62(17):2539-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262170-00014.
10
Enalapril and verapamil in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.依那普利与维拉帕米治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压
Clin Ther. 1992 Nov-Dec;14(6):835-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons from the African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension: an update.非裔美国人肾脏疾病与高血压研究的经验教训:最新进展
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006 Oct;8(5):409-12. doi: 10.1007/s11906-006-0087-7.