Yuan J, Hennessy C, Givan A L, Corbett I P, Henry J A, Sherbet G V, Lennard T W
Department of Surgery, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1992 Mar;65(3):461-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.93.
This study was aimed at determining whether tumour DNA content measured by cell image analysis could provide additional prognostic information when compared to that provided by flow cytometry. Sections cut from paraffin blocks of tumours from 101 patients with node negative breast cancer were analysed by both methods and the results related to other prognostic variables and to patient relapse and overall survival. DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry classified 46 tumours as diploid and 55 as aneuploid, whereas by cell image analysis 30 were diploid and 71 aneuploid (P less than 0.002). There were 20 tumours with discrepancies between the two methods; 18 of these were tumours with only one peak in flow analysis, but determined to be aneuploid with image analysis. DNA content as measured by both methods was significant for predicting relapse and survival by log-rank test, as were tumour histological grade, c-erbB-2 expression and tumour size. Multivariate analysis showed DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry to be the only variable of independent significance (P less than 0.02) for both relapse and overall survival. Compared with cell image analysis, flow cytometry demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of diploid tumours, which may be related to differences in the internal standards applied to each method. We suggest that cell image analysis techniques can provide more sensitive information on the DNA content of tumour cells by direct measurement of nuclear DNA density of both normal lymphocytes and tumour cells in the same section. However, although image analysis appears to be more sensitive than flow cytometry in detecting DNA aneuploidy, the image technique appears to lack the specificity of flow cytometry in correlation with clinical outcome.
本研究旨在确定通过细胞图像分析测量的肿瘤DNA含量与流式细胞术相比,是否能提供额外的预后信息。对101例淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者肿瘤石蜡块切片采用两种方法进行分析,并将结果与其他预后变量以及患者复发和总生存期相关联。流式细胞术测量的DNA倍体分类显示,46个肿瘤为二倍体,55个为非整倍体;而细胞图像分析显示,30个为二倍体,71个为非整倍体(P小于0.002)。两种方法之间有20个肿瘤存在差异;其中18个是在流式分析中只有一个峰,但图像分析确定为非整倍体的肿瘤。通过两种方法测量的DNA含量经对数秩检验对预测复发和生存期具有显著性,肿瘤组织学分级、c-erbB-2表达和肿瘤大小也是如此。多变量分析显示,流式细胞术测量的DNA倍体是复发和总生存期唯一具有独立显著性的变量(P小于0.02)。与细胞图像分析相比,流式细胞术显示二倍体肿瘤的比例显著更高,这可能与应用于每种方法的内部标准差异有关。我们认为,细胞图像分析技术可通过直接测量同一切片中正常淋巴细胞和肿瘤细胞的核DNA密度,提供关于肿瘤细胞DNA含量更敏感的信息。然而,尽管图像分析在检测DNA非整倍体方面似乎比流式细胞术更敏感,但图像技术在与临床结果的相关性方面似乎缺乏流式细胞术的特异性。