Vicario J L, Martinez-Laso J, Corell A, Martin-Villa J M, Morales P, Lledo G, Segurado O G, de Juan D, Arnaiz-Villena A
Transfusion Centre, Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain.
Diabetologia. 1992 May;35(5):475-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02342447.
The question of HLA susceptibility to Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus remains unresolved. In the present study, 127 diabetic patients and 177 unrelated control subjects have been analysed for their class I and class II serological antigens, class II (DR, DQ) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms and DQA1 and B1 exon-2 nucleotide sequences and their corresponding amino acid residues. By using the aetiologic fraction (delta) as an almost absolute measure of the strongest linkage disequilibrium of an HLA marker to the putative Type 1 diabetes susceptibility locus, it has been found that the strength of association of the HLA markers may be quantified as follows: DR4 less than DR3 less than DR3 or DR4 less than non-Aspartate 57 beta DQ and Arginine 52 alpha DQ less than Arginine 52 alpha DQ. Thus, molecular HLA-DQ markers appear to be more accurate as susceptibility markers than the classic serologically defined ones (DR3 and DR4); however, any effect of DQ markers disappears when non-DR3/DR4 individuals are considered, suggesting that DR factors (or others in between DQ and DR) are also important. In addition, a dominant non-Aspartate 57 beta DQ susceptibility theory does not hold (but a recessive one does) in our diabetic population (probably due to the high frequency of the protective DR7-non-Aspartate 57 beta DQ haplotypes); Arginine 52 alpha DQ is the best single HLA marker found in our population, both as a recessive or as a dominant one. Also there are 13 patients in our sample who bear neither Arginine 52 alpha DQ nor non-Aspartate 57 beta DQ susceptibility factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
HLA与1型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病易感性的问题仍未解决。在本研究中,对127名糖尿病患者和177名无关对照受试者进行了I类和II类血清学抗原、II类(DR、DQ)DNA限制性片段长度多态性以及DQA1和B1外显子2核苷酸序列及其相应氨基酸残基的分析。通过使用病因分数(δ)作为HLA标记与假定的1型糖尿病易感位点最强连锁不平衡的近乎绝对的衡量标准,发现HLA标记的关联强度可按以下方式量化:DR4<DR3<DR3或DR4<非天冬氨酸57β-DQ和精氨酸52α-DQ<精氨酸52α-DQ。因此,分子HLA-DQ标记作为易感标记似乎比经典血清学定义的标记(DR3和DR4)更准确;然而,当考虑非DR3/DR4个体时,DQ标记的任何作用都会消失,这表明DR因素(或DQ和DR之间的其他因素)也很重要。此外,在我们的糖尿病患者群体中,显性非天冬氨酸57β-DQ易感性理论不成立(但隐性理论成立)(可能是由于保护性DR7-非天冬氨酸57β-DQ单倍型的高频率);精氨酸52α-DQ是我们群体中发现的最佳单一HLA标记,无论是作为隐性还是显性标记。在我们的样本中,也有13名患者既不携带精氨酸52α-DQ也不携带非天冬氨酸57β-DQ易感因素。(摘要截短于250字)