Bussmann Johannes B J, van den Berg-Emons Hendrika J G, Angulo Sonia M, Stijnen Theo, Stam Henk J
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):71-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0916-1. Epub 2003 Sep 16.
Accelerometry and heart rate (HR) are frequently used indicators of physical strain during normal daily life. The present study focused on the sensitivity and reproducibility of accelerometry (body motility, the intensity of body movement measured with accelerometry) and HR (percentage maximal heart rate reserve, %HRR(max)) in the assessment of physical strain during walking in persons with a lower leg amputation, using persons without an amputation as reference. Ten patients with an amputation of the leg and ten comparison subjects performed, at an interval of 1 month, the same walking protocol three times. Subjects walked at a preferred speed and at fixed speeds. At their preferred walking speed, speed (0.63 vs 1.31 m s(-1), P=0.001), body motility [0.53 vs 0.91 (arbitrary unit), P=0.001] and %HRR(max) (42.5 vs 27.6, P=0.02) differed between the amputation group and the comparison group. At fixed walking speeds, only %HRR(max) differed between groups ( P</=0.002) and showed a session effect ( P=0.02). The relationship between body motility and %HRR(max) in the patient group was significantly different from that in the comparison group. It can be concluded that accelerometry is strongly related with walking speed, but not sensitive to differences and changes in economy, contrary to %HRR(max). The use of accelerometry as an indicator of the level of physical strain in persons with an amputation is not feasible. The added value of a calibration procedure has to be studied.
加速度测量法和心率(HR)是日常生活中常用的身体应激指标。本研究以未截肢者为参照,聚焦于加速度测量法(身体运动,通过加速度测量法测得的身体运动强度)和心率(最大心率储备百分比,%HRR(max))在评估小腿截肢者行走过程中身体应激方面的敏感性和可重复性。10名腿部截肢患者和10名对照受试者每隔1个月进行3次相同的步行方案。受试者以偏好速度和固定速度行走。在偏好步行速度下,截肢组和对照组之间的速度(0.63对1.31 m s(-1),P = 0.001)、身体运动强度[0.53对0.91(任意单位),P = 0.001]和%HRR(max)(42.5对27.6,P = 0.02)存在差异。在固定步行速度下,仅%HRR(max)在组间存在差异(P≤0.002)且呈现出时段效应(P = 0.02)。患者组中身体运动强度与%HRR(max)之间的关系与对照组显著不同。可以得出结论,与%HRR(max)相反,加速度测量法与步行速度密切相关,但对经济性的差异和变化不敏感。将加速度测量法用作截肢者身体应激水平的指标是不可行的。校准程序的附加价值有待研究。